Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-14-2015, 11:36 AM
 
Location: West Hollywood
3,190 posts, read 3,165,952 times
Reputation: 5262

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBlasphemer View Post
Most normal, heterosexual people have a natural aversion to homosexuals. Men, in particular, are averse to gay males. It's natural, it's biological, it's genetic and it's normal.

Eventually, all of these bastions of gay identity (government, and the military in particular) are going to evolve to be exclusively "gay only" as normal people will naturally move away from a class of people who's value systems are the exact opposite of their own.
This is one of the most obnoxiously stupid posts in the entire thread. Holy crap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-14-2015, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Sunrise
10,865 posts, read 16,930,587 times
Reputation: 9084
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBlasphemer View Post
Most normal, heterosexual people have a natural aversion to homosexuals. Men, in particular, are averse to gay males. It's natural, it's biological, it's genetic and it's normal.

Eventually, all of these bastions of gay identity (government, and the military in particular) are going to evolve to be exclusively "gay only" as normal people will naturally move away from a class of people who's value systems are the exact opposite of their own.
Well, you certainly lived up to your user name with this post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2015, 12:42 PM
 
Location: Berwick, Penna.
16,214 posts, read 11,252,894 times
Reputation: 20827
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBlasphemer View Post
Most normal, heterosexual people have a natural aversion to homosexuals. Men, in particular, are averse to gay males. It's natural, it's biological, it's genetic and it's normal.

Eventually, all of these bastions of gay identity (government, and the military in particular) are going to evolve to be exclusively "gay only" as normal people will naturally move away from a class of people who's value systems are the exact opposite of their own.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MordinSolus View Post
This is one of the most obnoxiously stupid posts in the entire thread. Holy crap.
Granted -- the first post, like the original post in this thread, is a ridiculous oversimplification intended for simple minds.

But the subsequent posts also serve to demonstrate that the Politically Correct want to silence anyone who doesn't see it their way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2015, 12:46 PM
 
Location: Type 0.73 Kardashev
11,110 posts, read 9,738,353 times
Reputation: 40160
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBlasphemer View Post
Most normal, heterosexual people have a natural aversion to homosexuals. Men, in particular, are averse to gay males. It's natural, it's biological, it's genetic and it's normal.

Eventually, all of these bastions of gay identity (government, and the military in particular) are going to evolve to be exclusively "gay only" as normal people will naturally move away from a class of people who's value systems are the exact opposite of their own.
You people never learn.

Never.

You social conservatives constantly spout doom-and-gloom every time someone suggests "You know, let's try something different."

Desegregate the armed forces?
"Perish the thought! Military moral will collapse! There will be no unit cohesion!"
Were you right or wrong? You were WRONG.

Repeal Jim Crow?
"No way! Blacks wil ruin everything!"
Were you right or wrong? You were WRONG.

Allow interracial marriage?
"No! It will destroy the white race!"
Were you right or wrong? You were WRONG.

Allow women to serve in the armed forces?
"Perish the thought! Military moral will collapse! There will be no unit cohesion!" [sound familiar?]
Were you right or wrong? You were WRONG.

Allow women to serve in combat units?
"Perish the thought! Military moral will collapse! There will be no unit cohesion!" [wrong. yet again.]
Were you right or wrong? You were WRONG.

Allow gays to serve openly in the military?
"Perish the thought! Military moral will collapse! There will be no unit cohesion!" [they just keeping making the tired old demonstrably false claims.]
Were you right or wrong? You were WRONG.

Allow same-sex marriage?
"We can't! Society will fall apart! And churches will be forced to marry gays!"
Were you right or wrong? You were WRONG - it's been 11 years since same-sex marriages began in Massachusetts, and the bogus claims made then are still bogus.

All you've got is empty claims. You cry wolf about everything, and every time you think people will believe you even with your long track-record of being wrong again and again.


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2015, 01:18 PM
 
Location: Sunrise
10,865 posts, read 16,930,587 times
Reputation: 9084
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd trick op View Post

But the subsequent posts also serve to demonstrate that the Politically Correct want to silence anyone who doesn't see it their way.
I have yet to see a post in this thread that suggests that people aren't free to say whatever they'd like. People are free to say they hate homosexuals. They're also free to say that Neil Armstrong made his speech from a sound stage. They're free to say the holocaust never happened. They're free to say they've seen bigfoot have sex with the Loch Ness monster. They're free to say nothing ever happened at a school in Newtown.

Just so long as they don't hinder the people who disagree with them, all is well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2015, 01:24 PM
 
107 posts, read 132,778 times
Reputation: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBlasphemer View Post
Most normal, heterosexual people have a natural aversion to homosexuals. Men, in particular, are averse to gay males. It's natural, it's biological, it's genetic and it's normal.

Eventually, all of these bastions of gay identity (government, and the military in particular) are going to evolve to be exclusively "gay only" as normal people will naturally move away from a class of people who's value systems are the exact opposite of their own.
It is not natural. It is because of social conditioning. I feel no aversion to homosexuals, and I'd bet that the reason people do is because from the moment they're born they're repeatedly bombarded with homophobia.

This whole fear-mongering 'one day it'll be gay only' makes absolutely no sense and there is zero evidence for that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2015, 01:25 PM
 
12,999 posts, read 18,807,159 times
Reputation: 9236
Basically pandering to the antigay wing of his party. He certainly can't point to his success on budget issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2015, 01:28 PM
 
Location: Sunrise
10,865 posts, read 16,930,587 times
Reputation: 9084
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvande55 View Post
Basically pandering to the antigay wing of his party. He certainly can't point to his success on budget issues.
The sad part about this is that it works. We have yet another case of a conservative nitwit ruining an economy and then shouting, "Boo! Homosexuals! Immigrants! Minorities!" to lather their simpleminded base into a frenzy.

Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

That's why this country is in a tailspin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2015, 01:34 PM
 
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
9,352 posts, read 19,950,651 times
Reputation: 11621
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBlasphemer View Post
Most normal, heterosexual people have a natural aversion to homosexuals. Men, in particular, are averse to gay males. It's natural, it's biological, it's genetic and it's normal.

Eventually, all of these bastions of gay identity (government, and the military in particular) are going to evolve to be exclusively "gay only" as normal people will naturally move away from a class of people who's value systems are the exact opposite of their own.


BWWHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAHAHAAAAA

oh, wait..... you actually believe this???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2015, 01:38 PM
 
16,233 posts, read 8,348,418 times
Reputation: 19102
Quote:
Originally Posted by MordinSolus View Post
Our founding fathers would be appalled by equal rights for women and minorities so clearly they're not the bastions of infallible morality you think them to be. They were brave, forward thinking men but they were still men, and men of their time. They couldn't possibly have predicted how complicated the world and humanity would become. To keep relying on them in in this day and age is really silly. I'm sorry that you think the founding fathers were gods, but this isn't North Korea. They were not omnipotent, they were not infallible, they weren't morally beyond reproach, and they didn't know everything.

And Christianity was not the framework for this country nor the unanimous religion of our founding fathers. We have a separation of church and state for a reason. I want religion as far away from legislation as possible.
While the FF were not gods nor infallible men, they were some of the greatest minds humanity has ever known. They constructed a Constitutional Republic like no other, to allow people to live free. Sure there were limitations on what could be achieved in their time, and they were astute enough to know slavery was not something that could be stopped in their time, even though many abhorred the practice. They obviously knew what they were talking about because the issue almost tore our country apart down the road.
Yet we can still depend on their general wisdom to guide us so long as we do not look at them through a modern PC lens.

As to your assertion of separation of church and state, you may well like your version. You may also like how the SC's liberal rulings have distorted their intentions. However if you read the FF's writings to glean what they intended, they did not want a ruling church/religion. However that does not mean they wanted total separation either. They would laugh at how it has been distorted to prevent manger displays from being erected, or issues with artistry of the SC building and people wishing to have it removed. I say this not as a Christian, rather someone who has extensively read the Federalist papers and studied their minds/thoughts.

BTW - You can say Christianity was not the unanimous religion of the FF's, but it was the overwhelming majority. Sure they did not take passages from the Bible and incorporate them into our Constitution. However their moral/values did derive to one extent or another from that basis.

`
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top