Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He is no question successful, but not the "most successful". I hope his replacement is another moderate, not an idiot war monger that is looking to make a ton of money with a company like Halliburton. Goodness! Anyway, Rolling Stone is a bit over the top with their article, but he is no doubt very successful as our current president. No one could argue against that, unless they truly are living under a rock, or a stone. Yeah, that was a pun. lol
I tend to think we will be very old men, if in our lifetime, by the time we finally know why GB elected to focus on Iraq instead of Al Queda in Afghanistan.
It's a global war on terror. Iraq's history of support for terrorists and it's violation of 19 consecutive UN Security Council resolutions and kicking out WMD inspectors may have had something to do with it. The attack on Iraq was debated for over a year, in public. It's not like the reasons for our intervention there is some cosmic mystery.
If successful means Obama has achieved most of the things he wanted to do while in office, YES he has been a huge success. He has humbled the United States, brought us down almost to Third World status. To quote? "Our friends do not trust us and our enemies no longer fear us". IOW he has been a disgrace.
He is no question successful, but not the "most successful". I hope his replacement is another moderate, not an idiot war monger that is looking to make a ton of money with a company like Halliburton. Goodness! Anyway, Rolling Stone is a bit over the top with their article, but he is no doubt very successful as our current president. No one could argue against that, unless they truly are living under a rock, or a stone. Yeah, that was a pun. lol
But I thought that he had been plagued by the "do nothing" congress that has blocked him at every turn.
It's a global war on terror. Iraq's history of support for terrorists and it's violation of 19 consecutive UN Security Council resolutions and kicking out WMD inspectors may have had something to do with it. The attack on Iraq was debated for over a year, in public. It's not like the reasons for our intervention there is some cosmic mystery.
I think you missed the point. And the context. But hey, Rock On.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
