By 2050, human-on-robot sex will be more common than human-on-human sex, says report

[PedroMartinez]

Originally Posted by AfriqueNY

Not true. Female sex toys outsell male sex toys 1000 to 1. Lol.... Most older women have some sort of sex device. So doesn't that count? I don't know any men with sex devices. There are alot of women with no lovers or partners . I'm sure they have urges and needs as well and the adult stores are full of devices for them. Imagine a inexpensive male robot that can handle your needs. They would sell like hotcakes...

999 of those 1,000 were bridal shower gag gifts.

[Yeledaf]

Originally Posted by WestCobb

In 2050, I'll be in my mid 70s. I doubt I'll be having sex with anyone -- robot or otherwise.

Depends largely on your retirement cash flow.

[Rakin]

Originally Posted by AfriqueNY

Imagine a inexpensive male robot that can handle your needs. They would sell like hotcakes...

It already exists. Google Sybian.

[USNRET04]

Do I have to call the robot the next day?

[Fat Freddy]

Why would anyone want a Robot as big as a person when all they need is a vagina, penis, mouth, and anus?

[el_marto]

Originally Posted by WestCobb

In 2050, I'll be in my mid 70s. I doubt I'll be having sex with anyone -- robot or otherwise.

Think of the ultra-viagra that'll be doing the rounds by 2050. The future's bright!!!

[North Beach Person]

Even if robots replacing women does happen I'll bet that some Relationships posters still won't be able to get a date.

[Unsettomati]

Can you imagine having sex with a humanoid robot? Apparently, this will be the norm in a few short decades. Futurologist Dr Ian Pearson has released a report in which he predicts the future of sex.

By 2050, human-on-robot sex will be more common than human-on-human sex, says report - Telegraph

Wait... 'report'? They made a mistake - that's not how you spell wild conjecture.

Oh, and... 'futurologist'? Where's a smirking emoticon when you need one?

[Mathguy]

Originally Posted by Unsettomati

By 2050, human-on-robot sex will be more common than human-on-human sex, says report - Telegraph

Wait... 'report'? They made a mistake - that's not how you spell wild conjecture.

Oh, and... 'futurologist'? Where's a smirking emoticon when you need one?

Futurologist? That title alone qualifies them for their own show on either the History Channel or Animal Planet.

[Arcenal813]

Originally Posted by PedroMartinez

999 of those 1,000 were bridal shower gag gifts.

You'd be surprised how many women actively go to sex stores for personal sex toys.