Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Because the Russians and others have dumped nuke waste in the ocean over that way for decades and it's a HUGE ocean.
National geographic had a nice article on it a year or so ago and frankly the claim smacks of coming from some sort of crackpot website like naturalnews or alex jones.
I'm pinning my hopes on the big ocean thing. I'm also old enough to no longer care. No, yes, I care about pollution, but I really like salty water. I'm going in.
Because the Russians and others have dumped nuke waste in the ocean over that way for decades and it's a HUGE ocean.
National geographic had a nice article on it a year or so ago and frankly the claim smacks of coming from some sort of crackpot website like naturalnews or alex jones.
Since nat geo got bought out by Fox news, well, I don't find them newsworthy anymore.
It is currently (mostly) contained but at some point it will have to be dealt with- and it rounds counter to intelligence to believe that at some point radiation isn't going to affect the west coast...
"Fox News is clearly more conservative than ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC and National Public Radio. Some will conclude that 'therefore, this means that Fox News has a conservative bias,'" he writes in an advance copy provided to Washington Whispers. "Instead, maybe it is centrist, and possibly even left-leaning, while all the others are far left. It's like concluding that six-three is short just because it is short compared to professional basketball players."
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAjerseychick
It is currently (mostly) contained but at some point it will have to be dealt with- and it rounds counter to intelligence to believe that at some point radiation isn't going to affect the west coast..."
Not sure what your definition of "contained" is but it appears far from that with the latest reports coming out.
I wasn't.
The point was made that California also built nuclear facilities near the shoreline.
A very bad move!!!
My moderator's note was a general warning based on exchanges by others further up the thread - it followed your most recent post but wasn't directed to you.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
but it appears far from that with the latest reports coming out. 
