Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-29-2017, 07:14 AM
 
30,143 posts, read 11,778,294 times
Reputation: 18666

Advertisements

Reminds me of an episode of Reno 911!

The language is a bit crude

Lottery - RENO 911! | Comedy Central
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-29-2017, 07:19 AM
 
Location: 912 feet above sea level
2,264 posts, read 1,483,389 times
Reputation: 12668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
When the prize gets big, sales explode because infrequent players buy tickets.
Right.

People who apparently don't think winning $100,000,000 would be all that life-changing think winning $500,000,000 would be super-duper life-changing.

"Whoa! Now I could buy five times as many mansions, yachts, and private jets! I'm buying!"

If I were a lottery player (I'm not - the only ticket I've ever bought is a scratch-off that I damaged when I worked at a convenience store and was obligated to purchase it - I did, and I won my dollar back) I'd want an option where I could cap my potential winnings in exchange for increased odds. For example, if the pot was $500,000,000 I might want to select to cap my winnings at 1/20th that amount (ie, $25,000,000) in exchange for increasing my odds of winning by 20. Going from my net worth to $25,000,000 would be far, far more life-changing that going from a net worth of $25,000,000 to ... well, really any greater amount.

But then, that's probably why I'm not the target audience of the various lotteries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2017, 07:32 AM
 
30,143 posts, read 11,778,294 times
Reputation: 18666
Quote:
Originally Posted by hertfordshire View Post
Hmmm ... I must have missed the part where it said she plays the lottery every day.
Spend her last $4 on lottery tickets. A would say she has a bit of a gambling problem.

Also the women said they thought they won $18K but the top prize was $500. I don't get that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2017, 07:37 AM
 
16,418 posts, read 12,499,246 times
Reputation: 59629
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackwinkelman View Post
Spend her last $4 on lottery tickets. A would say she has a bit of a gambling problem.

Also the women said they thought they won $18K but the top prize was $500. I don't get that.
Hmmm ... I must have missed the part where it said she spent her last $4.

Between herself and her mother in law, they apparently bought 36 tickets at $1 a piece. $36 between two people is not an outrageous amount (especially when you have reason to believe it's a sure thing), and there's nothing to suggest that it was the last of their money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2017, 07:42 AM
 
6,806 posts, read 4,472,094 times
Reputation: 31230
It was South Carolina's error. South Carolina should hold itself responsible to make it right. "Oh, sorry, it was a mistake" isn't good enough. Give each winning ticket holder $50 and a few free tickets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2017, 07:44 AM
 
Location: Between Heaven And Hell.
13,624 posts, read 10,027,837 times
Reputation: 17011
They could have just let it go, couldn't they? Our Camelot let a fake claim through, and oddly enough, the police are letting it go too.

National Lottery operator Camelot fined £3 million for 'fraudulent prize claim' - ITV News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2017, 07:44 AM
 
17,298 posts, read 22,030,713 times
Reputation: 29643
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Geek View Post
Error in South Carolina lottery game brings highs, then lows - CNN

My favorite line from this is the woman who is upset because she had been promising to take her kids to Disney but couldn't afford it but now she finally could! Until her hopes were crushed.

Maybe if she didn't play the lottery every day she'd have taken them to Disney multiple times by now.
I could be wrong but it appears that people figured out the lottery was printing flawed tickets (they were all winners) and they started buying them in bulk. This "winner" bought tickets in a few locations then gets upset when the lottery declares the tickets invalid. She won 18,000 on a game that only has a max win of $500 so she had to buy 36 tickets to win 18K.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2017, 07:53 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania & New Jersey
1,548 posts, read 4,315,078 times
Reputation: 1769
Default Investment Advisor's Perspective

Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
I buy a lottery ticket maybe twice a year...maybe. It's always an impulse buy, but I'm not by any means a regular player. I'm sure I'm not alone in that once or twice a year impulse, no matter what your assumptions might be. What a downer to think you won, only to have it snatched away.
Me too, but it's not an impulse buy. I'll buy a powerball ticket when the pot gets above $584 million because my anticipated return on investment is then greater than 1:1

Odds of winning are 1:292,000,000. Cost of ticket is $2. Therefore, anticipated return on investment is 1:1 when the value of the pot hits odds times cost >>> $292,000,000 x 2 = $584,000,000.

But if I don't win it, it's okay because I've already done better! Less than 4% of the world's population is born American, and that's a lottery I am fortunate enough to have hit! Thanks mom and dad!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2017, 09:18 AM
 
30,143 posts, read 11,778,294 times
Reputation: 18666
Quote:
Originally Posted by hertfordshire View Post
Hmmm ... I must have missed the part where it said she spent her last $4.

Between herself and her mother in law, they apparently bought 36 tickets at $1 a piece. $36 between two people is not an outrageous amount (especially when you have reason to believe it's a sure thing), and there's nothing to suggest that it was the last of their money.
Anyone with even half a brain would know the state would never pay out on it. It was almost like looting lottery style.

She said in the video it was her last $4.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2017, 09:54 AM
 
16,418 posts, read 12,499,246 times
Reputation: 59629
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackwinkelman View Post
She said in the video it was her last $4.
Thank you for clarifying. I didn't see a video. I read the story.

But considering that lotteries usually deal in cash only, she could have meant she used her last $4 of cash that she had. I've frequently said "I used my last $5" meaning cash on hand. It doesn't necessarily mean the last $5 to my name.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top