Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-22-2018, 10:43 AM
 
Location: Lakewood OH
21,695 posts, read 28,440,498 times
Reputation: 35863

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by blisterpeanuts View Post
The countries with the highest birth rates also have the highest infant mortality and under-5 death rates. Most of Africa is this way.

Turkey has a slightly higher birth rate than the U.S., but its infant mortality is triple ours.

It's still true, though, that the poorest countries and the Muslim world are out-breeding the developed countries, although birth rates are declining everywhere.

I have a theory that the human race collectively understands that we're overpopulated, and somehow instinctively we're just breeding less.
The US isn’t doing very well in the mother mortality rate either.

https://www.npr.org/2017/05/12/52809...eveloped-world
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-22-2018, 10:43 AM
 
Location: colorado springs, CO
9,512 posts, read 6,098,140 times
Reputation: 28836
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmyp25 View Post
Well , illegals, muslims , and latinos don't seem to care. Why? Because you and the government will pay for their children to be raised through taxation. A lot of the illegals have 5 -6 -7 kids and work a minimum wage job. Who do you think is paying for them? Its cultural suicide for caucasians to say that you cannot have more kids because its too expensive etc....
The Muslims, illegals & Latinos don’t care because they were not subjected to the intensified “electronic” propaganda campaign that was formally recommended in the Kissinginger Report (nssm200) of 1974.

With the exception of South America.

It was somewhat of an oversight to cover the entire globe under satellite communication without realizing that only the already developed countries would have citizens with the capability of receiving the signals.

The countries that were most desperate for our USAID bribes (India, sub-Saharan Africa) had to instead resort to incentivized mass surgical sterilization campaigns or chemical sterilization (proved to not ensure permanent results) under the guise of Immunization.

The next huge oversight was thinking that the Muslim leaders were in any way, shape or form; going to allow for mass media from the USA to reach their people. How ironic, given that the #1 goal of population control was to minimize the number of vigilante youth that would defend & resist the US attempts to access the real motivator of population control: All That Oil.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2018, 11:12 AM
 
Location: colorado springs, CO
9,512 posts, read 6,098,140 times
Reputation: 28836
Quote:
Originally Posted by NDak15 View Post
Replacement level. As long as we have breeder families out there who keep pooping out kids there will be no issue with replacement level.
No. You want healthy, well educated, married couples with high income potential to be breeders.

Another oversight: The Kissinger Report mistakenly advised that increasing the financial viability of targeted poor populations would lead to lower fertility rates. This was based on statistics that higher-income populations had lower fertility. Which is true.

However, they failed to realize that these higher-income populations didn’t just have more money: They had married parents & an education.

Welfare was a huge, huge mistake. Almost as huge as promoting the feminist agenda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2018, 11:20 AM
 
Location: Southern California
29,267 posts, read 16,738,469 times
Reputation: 18909
Speaking of the aging population, I was talking to a couple of my bridge friends, I'm not playing now due to knee mess and can't sit for hours, but I LOVED the game. Many of the woman are turning 87 this year and one former member is 99 or 100 and we've lost contact as she moved to assisted living and another one who lives in a house by herself is 103....and still plays bridge...keep the brain working.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top