Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-27-2018, 05:48 PM
 
Location: Alexandria, VA, USA
1,110 posts, read 896,081 times
Reputation: 2517

Advertisements

I am sorry for him, he appears to be a decent person, while she appears to be an avaricious gold digger. He is quite lucky to be rid of her.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-27-2018, 06:10 PM
 
Location: Texas
13,480 posts, read 8,376,656 times
Reputation: 25948
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmm0484 View Post
I am sorry for him, he appears to be a decent person, while she appears to be an avaricious gold digger. He is quite lucky to be rid of her.
Sure but he will likely keep going after the same type of woman.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2018, 09:08 PM
 
10,225 posts, read 7,579,494 times
Reputation: 23161
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocko20 View Post
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-...5?link=sfmw_fb

Wow, I guess the saying is true: a fool and his money are soon parted. Why would anyone need such an expensive ring that depreciates as fast as a new car just driven off the lot?
As for whether it's that expensive, that depends on how wealthy he is. It might be like someone else spending $2,000, compared to income.

I think he'll win the case. Engagement rings are given in contemplation of marriage. Even if he breaks it off, I think it has to be returned. But he would be on the hook for any wedding expenses she's incurred, like the dress, catering orders, and such. But she'd have to sue separately for that. She'd still have to give the ring back. But maybe it's state law, and it's not that clear.

But I can understand why she doesn't want to part with it! Wow...that's probably a terrific ring! For a woman to want a ring like that, it sounds like she comes from money, and he was marrying up. Your average gal isn't that schooled in diamonds & such, unless she is used to things like that.

But we only have his side of it. She has a side, also. But really, who would want an expensive ring like that, anyway? You'd have to insure it, and you can't wear it everywhere. You'd be a mark for burglars,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2018, 11:16 PM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,613 posts, read 9,446,498 times
Reputation: 22950
Quote:
Originally Posted by bpollen View Post
As for whether it's that expensive, that depends on how wealthy he is. It might be like someone else spending $2,000, compared to income.
Article says he took out a $30K loan, savings, and maxed out credit cards to get the ring.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2018, 12:01 AM
 
9,418 posts, read 13,493,575 times
Reputation: 10305
Quote:
Originally Posted by PriscillaVanilla View Post
Agree. I was surprised to read that someone thinks diamond jewelry depreciate in value the same way a car does. Also, some people buy jewelry, at least partly, for investment purposes.
It doesn't appreciate the way some people think it does. When one has a piece appraised for insurance, it's not the same price one will get in the resell market. Even if it's Harry Winston. Insurance appraisal is higher.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2018, 12:07 AM
 
779 posts, read 471,757 times
Reputation: 1462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electrician4you View Post
Rarely. Unless it’s a investment grade clarity and above a certain carat.



Yes. That’s right. But this guy took out a loan and used cc to do it. Multi millionaires have that money. I dint think this guy did have the money everyone assumes he does. His profession doesn’t mean anything. Most lawyers don’t get paid millions. Most lawyers average 140,000 dollars a year.
No, he had to finance 30K out of 100K. Still means he can probably "afford" it. Smart...maybe not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2018, 12:10 AM
 
779 posts, read 471,757 times
Reputation: 1462
[quote=Rocko20;53203553]That’s a non-sequitur.

We all have things we don’t need, but we don’t take out a $30,000 personal loan, savings, and max out credit cards to purchase 1 big thing we can’t afford.


I think you need to re-evaluate "non-sequitur." And then re-evaluate your original question.

Human's do all sorts of things we don't "need." Including you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2018, 12:15 AM
 
779 posts, read 471,757 times
Reputation: 1462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
This. This is the reality check people need, regarding how much lawyers make. There are only a few niches in the legal field. that pay highly, and even then, it's not enough to drop $100K on a ring for Muffy.
True, but I'm guessing this guy is clearing much more than 140K. Whether it was a smart decision or if he can truly "afford" it is another set of questions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2018, 08:03 AM
 
2,189 posts, read 2,605,088 times
Reputation: 3736
Demanding a certain kind of ring is a huge red flag and if he was foolish enough to miss that red flag then as the old saying goes, a fool and his money are soon parted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2018, 08:27 AM
 
Location: City Data Land
17,156 posts, read 12,956,211 times
Reputation: 33184
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC View Post
I thought that was the legal deal, with some degree of legal precedence.

If she breaks it off, he gets the ring back.

If he breaks it off, she has the option to keep it.

(And there it is, one more data point for the axiom, the bigger the stone the shorter the marriage. This one was so huge she didn't even make it down the aisle before calling the impending marriage off)

I found a photo:

https://modernluxury.com/washington-...trassercopyjpg
It is. It is what they call a conditional gift: a gift given only if X occurs, in this case, marriage. They did not get married, therefor he gets the ring back. But the law varies. Sometimes he gets the ring back no matter who breaks up with who. Sometimes it depends on the reason for the break up. Sometimes she gets to keep it (but this is rare.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top