U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old Yesterday, 04:38 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
22,336 posts, read 27,346,957 times
Reputation: 27941

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloudy Dayz View Post
No read it. You do not need to return it. The FTC is very clear about it. You have no legal obligation to pay for or return the merchandise. You can if you so choose, offer to return it, if the seller agrees to pay for shipping and handling.
The circumstance you are referring to is when the merchandise you did not order is shipped to you with your name on the shipping label and the invoice. You can keep that and you do not have to pay for it.

That does not apply to a package with someone else's name on the label and the shipping invoice. You need to return that. Keeping it is theft. It was misdelivered, never intended for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old Yesterday, 05:10 PM
 
Location: Oregon Coast
4,650 posts, read 1,819,454 times
Reputation: 6084
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxus View Post
Sigh, again, not the same situation. Have no idea why you and other posters keep bringing something not applicable up.
How is it not applicable? He received merchandise that he didn't order. That makes it a free gift under federal law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 05:15 PM
 
Location: Oregon Coast
4,650 posts, read 1,819,454 times
Reputation: 6084
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
The circumstance you are referring to is when the merchandise you did not order is shipped to you with your name on the shipping label and the invoice. You can keep that and you do not have to pay for it.

That does not apply to a package with someone else's name on the label and the shipping invoice. You need to return that. Keeping it is theft. It was misdelivered, never intended for you.
Is that your opinion, or do you have a source to back it up? I gave you a source for my information, the FTC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 05:50 PM
 
19,291 posts, read 15,898,671 times
Reputation: 36301
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloudy Dayz View Post
Is that your opinion, or do you have a source to back it up? I gave you a source for my information, the FTC.
Someone earlier did, pages back. The FTCs job is protecting consumers from fraud, they don’t govern sales utransactions between consumers and legitimate businesses. This was not a case of fraud by the merchant and and not in FTC jurisdiction.


https://www.ftc.gov/about-ftc/what-we-do

“The FTC protects consumers by stopping unfair, deceptive or fraudulent practices in the marketplace.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 08:17 PM
 
Location: Riding a rock floating through space
1,389 posts, read 383,328 times
Reputation: 3610
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloudy Dayz View Post
Is that your opinion, or do you have a source to back it up? I gave you a source for my information, the FTC.
Wth is the matter with you - what does it matter if he could legally get away with it (which he can't) - where is your sense of right and wrong? He received a shipment by mistake, he was contacted by the shipper then the cops to get it back and he refused - anyone defending this guy has a lack of integrity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 09:22 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
22,336 posts, read 27,346,957 times
Reputation: 27941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloudy Dayz View Post
How is it not applicable? He received merchandise that he didn't order. That makes it a free gift under federal law.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloudy Dayz View Post
Is that your opinion, or do you have a source to back it up? I gave you a source for my information, the FTC.
The shipper did not send it to him intending to ask him to pay for it. That is the kind of activity that the FTC intends to prevent.

You cannot send someone something he did not order and then demand payment for it.

You are misinterpreting the FTC rule. It does not say you can keep something addressed to another person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 09:40 PM
 
21,402 posts, read 27,370,385 times
Reputation: 15520
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post

You are misinterpreting the FTC rule. It does not say you can keep something addressed to another person.
Was this addressed to another person? I can't seem to find anything that clarifies that.

Cloudy, the legal issue seems to be that he signed for something he knew he didn't order, and because it was a high-dollar item, he was charged with larceny.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 09:54 PM
 
1,006 posts, read 499,691 times
Reputation: 952
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
The shipper did not send it to him intending to ask him to pay for it. That is the kind of activity that the FTC intends to prevent.

You cannot send someone something he did not order and then demand payment for it.

You are misinterpreting the FTC rule. It does not say you can keep something addressed to another person.
I couldn't find anything that says this delivery was addressed to another person. However, if it was, then this man is under no privilege to open or accept the package... as long as he is aware that it was not addressed to him. This is one area where ignorance actually trumps knowledge.

However, the courts have supported that if a product is delivered to a person, with correct address, that person, in accordance with FTC consumer protection laws, is allowed to keep the product. Specifically, the sender and/or shipper is not allowed to a) demand payment for the product; b) demand return of the product; c) prevent the receiver from disposing of the product however they wish.

Without additional information, it's unclear what happened here. But if it was addressed to another person (which would require a clearly visible address label), this man has no privilege to keep the product.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 11:35 PM
 
Location: Oregon Coast
4,650 posts, read 1,819,454 times
Reputation: 6084
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
The shipper did not send it to him intending to ask him to pay for it. That is the kind of activity that the FTC intends to prevent.

You cannot send someone something he did not order and then demand payment for it.

You are misinterpreting the FTC rule. It does not say you can keep something addressed to another person.
No they delivered it to him for free. That makes it a free gift according to the FTC.

This is the equivalent of me bringing a TV over to your house and leaving it on your doorstep, then coming back a week later and demanding you return it to me. You can't just drop property on someone's doorstep, and expect them to take care of it for you and return it to you when you demand it. That is not the way things work. When you abandoned items on some else property, it is their right to keep it, or dispose of it anyway they see fit.

Last edited by Cloudy Dayz; Yesterday at 11:46 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 11:50 PM
 
15 posts, read 483 times
Reputation: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010
That does not apply to a package with someone else's name on the label and the shipping invoice. You need to return that. Keeping it is theft. It was misdelivered, never intended for you.
Yes and why the guy listenend to the delivery man who said it was OK to keep it is beyond me...... What about the guy who paid alot of money?? (He isnt offering to pay him for what HE got instead)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. | Please obey Forum Rules | Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top