|

04-15-2009, 07:15 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dallas
325 posts, read 264,720 times
Reputation: 94
|
|
Feud or no feud, the whole region is still doing (comparatively) well. So let's bury the hatchet:
Best Cities For Jobs - Forbes.com
|
|

04-15-2009, 12:07 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DFW Metroplex, TEXAS
729 posts, read 343,208 times
Reputation: 284
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy
And congrats ! You will have the honor of having the first Super-Bowl ever in
North Texas !
|
How is that, Ft Worth is going to annex Arlington by 2011?
|
|

04-15-2009, 12:31 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
846 posts, read 387,412 times
Reputation: 244
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dangerfield
How is that, Ft Worth is going to annex Arlington by 2011?
|
She was implying Arlington is extended Fort Worth and it is extended Fort Worth I really don't care what the MSA say and all that crap. Dallas just wants to claim Arlington as a suburb. Dallas suburbs are Grandpraire, Irvin eastward. I live in Fort Worth and I am literally 5 minutes away from the new stadium. Dallas even try to claim Hurst, Euless, and Beford now. Next it will Crowley, Benbrook, Whatuga, White Settlement they will be trying to claim. Anything in Tarrant County is basically Fort Worth even if you like it or not.
|
|

04-15-2009, 12:41 PM
|
|
Proud Gay Conservative!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: LONE STAR STATE
2,040 posts, read 1,434,556 times
Reputation: 739
|
|
|
20 or 30 years ago I would have said YES, Arlington is a suburb of both Dallas and Fort Worth......Today, not so much, I think Arlington can hold its own, as can Plano. The unique thing about the DFW area is that it doesnt have just One principle city, It has SEVERAL. That alone makes DFW stand out above anywhere else.
|
|

04-15-2009, 02:18 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
554 posts, read 470,824 times
Reputation: 157
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXTwizter
20 or 30 years ago I would have said YES, Arlington is a suburb of both Dallas and Fort Worth......Today, not so much, I think Arlington can hold its own, as can Plano. The unique thing about the DFW area is that it doesnt have just One principle city, It has SEVERAL. That alone makes DFW stand out above anywhere else.
|
That's why people think that it shouldn't be coined as "Dallas" as being the largest metro area in texas. It's DFW becasue Dallas wouldn't be able to do it by itself. Soon, it should be DFWA (Dallas/Ft.Worth/Arlington) 
|
|

04-15-2009, 02:49 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Knox - Henderson
674 posts, read 371,465 times
Reputation: 207
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by C2H (ComingtoHouston)
That's why people think that it shouldn't be coined as "Dallas" as being the largest metro area in texas. It's DFW becasue Dallas wouldn't be able to do it by itself. Soon, it should be DFWA (Dallas/Ft.Worth/Arlington) 
|
Actually, it already is called the Dallas-Ft.Worth-Arlington MSA. United States metropolitan area - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|

04-15-2009, 04:31 PM
|
|
Funkytown's Finest
Status:
"GO FROGS!!! Don't back Down!"
(set 19 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Prairie View A&M Univ.
2,114 posts, read 1,764,538 times
Reputation: 618
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by C2H (ComingtoHouston)
That's why people think that it shouldn't be coined as "Dallas" as being the largest metro area in texas. It's DFW becasue Dallas wouldn't be able to do it by itself. Soon, it should be DFWA (Dallas/Ft.Worth/Arlington) 
|
Or how about giving it an acronym..... The FWAD Area, maybe? 
|
|

04-15-2009, 06:44 PM
|
|
Go Rangers
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: DFW
631 posts, read 318,648 times
Reputation: 166
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJG
Or how about giving it an acronym..... The FWAD Area, maybe? 
|
I'm sure the term DFW will be around for a while even with Arlington's growth.
|
|

04-15-2009, 06:47 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Washington D.C. by way of Texas. Maybe Chicago next year
4,588 posts, read 2,544,263 times
Reputation: 999
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXTwizter
20 or 30 years ago I would have said YES, Arlington is a suburb of both Dallas and Fort Worth......Today, not so much, I think Arlington can hold its own, as can Plano. The unique thing about the DFW area is that it doesnt have just One principle city, It has SEVERAL. That alone makes DFW stand out above anywhere else.
|
Yes locally, I can understand that. Outside of the immediate area, the entire area will still be called Dallas area or Dallas-Fort Worth. Just like the Bay Area is called the San Francisco Bay area and it isn't even the largest city in the metro area. The Tampa Bay area is Tampa and St. Petersburg and St. Petersburg is a pretty large city by itself in another county and is home to the Tampa Bay Rays.
I do however disagree with Arlington standing on it's own. It's a suburb in every sense of the word. It leaches off both Dallas AND Fort Worth and owes it's current status to those two cities.
|
|

04-16-2009, 01:00 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
846 posts, read 387,412 times
Reputation: 244
|
|
|
Arlington does not even have a downtown area or big business complex. So yes Arlington is very dependent.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|