![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 400,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 13,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.| Search our forums (advanced): |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
There are also wonderful people from So. Cal.! AND, if people from SO. Cal. are moving to Denver it's most likely cuz they want to get away from the pretenciousness and image-oriented attitudes of LA & OC and are seeking a more relaxed lifestyle. Letts' be friends! ![]() |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
sounds like i am right back at my ghetto highschool that i cudnt wait to grad from i am sure denvr has plenty of females honestly theyr gonna be some girls there 4 miln ppl few hundred thousand chicks in tha age range will prob be lookin for action i wudnt worry, that goes for any large metropolatian araea
Last edited by Mike from back east; 01-09-2008 at 07:58 PM. Reason: language |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
As far as the "Best Cities for Singles" Rankings - Yes, Forbes rated Denver/Boulder as top 5 for several years running. Unfortunately, their methodology in determining this was, "The number of singles is based on the percentage of a metro's population above the age of 15 that has never been married. Data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau." So basically any metro area that had a couple relatively large college campuses nearby made the list. Fair enough (also note than when they discluded Boulder in following years the city dropped a significant rank)... but what would be more appropriate for this topic would be a "Best Places for Male Singles" and a "Best Places for Female Singles" study. Perhaps Denver would turn out #1 for female singles, but much lower on the list for male singles. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
forbes' criteria had a bit to do with how many people were on match, as well. and, how cheap a 6 pack and pizza might be, or how "cool" people think the city might be, or # of restaurants and bars (regardless of variety or quality). yet, they didn't consider that people might be STAYING single due to some cultural oddity, or that some singles might do fine, while the rest might not (no comment on m:f ratio, no substantial comment on the culture of the place other than "there are museums - regardless of how many people actually ever use them) or "if you're not sporty, you might get left out". anyway, some of their criteria seem like reasons for a place to come in last, but, that's my own opinion. denver boulder are probably decent for female singles, i agree. probably more so for a particular demographic or two of the women... |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't know how to state this without sounding bitter, rude, out-of-line, even..perhaps..but as a native Colorado who has since moved and lived elsewhere....there is something unique about the majority of women in Colorado...and not unique in a good sense but unique in how caddy and jealous and b*****y they are...as if they are constantly sizing you up as competition rather than a potential friend. I realized, as a native Coloradan, after moving out-of-state, that in fact I wasn't a female who preferred male friends....it's just that I hadn't met the right women....and i'm sorry to say...as a native female from Colorado....there's a weird negative streak in a lot of the females who live here...at least in the Denver/Boulder/Greater metro area...anyone else have thoughts on this?
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
People are people. Some people are jerks, some are nice. I think it's easier to generalize people across socio-economic lines (wherein people can make assumptions and judgments about rank in society) than geographical lines.
Last edited by Charles; 01-21-2008 at 09:35 AM. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
well, geographical lines DO correlate with "culture". canada, mexico, the northeast, the south, the west coast are geographical as well as cultural identities to some extent (regardless of whether or not some individuals within those regions might reflect the "culture"), no?
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It's free and quick. Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|