Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado > Denver
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-25-2014, 10:55 PM
 
Location: Denver, CO
130 posts, read 163,496 times
Reputation: 182

Advertisements

As announced here previously, we're moving to Denver for the month of June to "try it out" (stuff in storage, will move it out if we decide to stay). We're coming through Four Corners for sightseeing reasons, and overnighting in Durango.

Question is on the route from Durango to Denver: west on 160 to 285? Or straight west on 160 to 25 and on north? The former seems more scenic than the latter, and possibly more direct; but it seems to go through mountains most of the way, so I'm wondering if that would make it longer time-wise?

Any comments on the two routes (or alternates) are welcome.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-25-2014, 11:03 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA metro
341 posts, read 708,401 times
Reputation: 186
I'd say continue east on 160 until you get to I-25 north into Denver. Passing thru CO Springs. You will get plenty of sightseeing on that route, sure you would probably see even more perhaps by taking 285 north but likely would take too long to get to DEN. Just as you presumed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2014, 11:09 PM
 
Location: Aurora, CO
8,603 posts, read 14,881,270 times
Reputation: 15396
If you're coming into Denver during an off-peak/non-rush-hour time I would just take 285. It's about 50 miles shorter than going 160 to I-25 and roughly 30 minutes faster depending on traffic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2014, 08:27 AM
 
Location: 0.83 Atmospheres
11,477 posts, read 11,552,056 times
Reputation: 11976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacifico View Post
I'd say continue east on 160 until you get to I-25 north into Denver. Passing thru CO Springs. You will get plenty of sightseeing on that route, sure you would probably see even more perhaps by taking 285 north but likely would take too long to get to DEN. Just as you presumed.
Disagree. I drive this all the time 285 is almost always the better route.

The real scenic route is to take 550 north, drive the Million Dollar Highway, go up to Grand Junction, then across I-70 through Glenwood Canyon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado > Denver

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top