|
Boring, Mellie? ... ah, I think not, esp compared to Detroit. Pullleeez.
Duke, I recognize Detroit's strong areas, but to me, in city, they are limited.
Greektown is THE strongest, but it is about 1 block X 2 blocks. And much of its energy is indoors -- the casino and mall with that great boutique hotel (Athenaeum?). Mexicantown has great restaurants, but is even smaller as well as being totally car oriented; it's like an isolated little island wedged next to the freeway (I-75?). Trust me, the area around Mexicantown is VERY unappealing and unsafe; not to mention you have to drive past that spooky husk of a gem, the abandoned, verge-of-collapsing Michigan Central RR terminal. To me, Woodward, from around the nice new Campus Martius to around Wayne State is promising -- dead in some spots, but nice in others...
That said, Detroit has a ways to go to match Cleveland (and believe me, Cleveland's not perfect, but has a major leg up on Motown). Downtown Cleveland has more residents, more shops and restaurants, is far more pedestrian orient, has more retail (in malls, I grant you, and is much better served by public transit (rail and bus). The nearby Flats, once a gem, is struggling but coming back. Immediately across the Cuyahoga River, almost like a sub-downtown, is Ohio City featuring the West Side market and, again, is denser and more walk-able. It is also served, directly, by rail... oh yeah, that doesn't exist in Detroit sans, the mighty, er... People Mover.
And please don't tell me your measly cultural district is in the same universe as University Circle (and U. Circle's on the cusp of a major upgrade in terms of beefing up its retail core along with upwards of 300 apartment units and a huge Barnes & Noble along with a brand new rail transit station and bus rapid transit.
Nice as Belle Isle can be (note the "can"), I'll take our Edgewater Park along the Lake, where (yes) you can swim, walk along the rocks, (yes) fish, picnic and is abutted by the wealthiest in-city neighborhood which, itself, is immediately adjacent to Lakewood with its Chicago-like Gold Coast and shops and outdoor restaurants galore...
And that leads me to another point. Cleveland's smaller, more compact size is actually an advantage over Detroit. Our strong neighborhoods seem more accessible (by public trans or car) where as Detroit's sprawling nature makes the city seem so empty. And the truly great urban-ish areas: Royal Oak, Birmingham (though a tad hoity-toity and preppy but still nice) and Ann Arbor are wayyyy out there and must be reached by serious freeway driving.
Conversely, a number of Cleveland's urbanized, close in burbs like Lakewood, and Cleveland Heights, are so close in, accessible, old and urbanized (as in lots of old brownstone apartments), they almost seem like part of Cleveland -- if you didn't see the Welcome To ____ you'd still think you were in Cleveland.
I've said it before and won't change my tune: while not a cure all, developing some kind of rapid rail for Detroit would move that city along 10-times faster (literally, figuratively) than it will ever get without it. Continued refusal to move (mainly because of conservative, suburban bosses) will continue to keep Detroit in 2nd class status, and yes, well behind Cleveland.
Reasonable people, of course, may disagree, but I'm sure among reasonable sources I'd get a lot more people on my side than yours... if you want some indicator, peruse some of the reputable on-line travel sites and read the comments of neutral travelers to both cities (start w/ Yahoo Travel)... CASE CLOSED.
|