Is this true? A 'Dog Year' Isn't Equivalent To 7 Human Years (lab, cataracts)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Dogs age at different rates compared to humans, but the simple rule of 7 dog years to 1 human year is far from accurate.
If human actually aged seven times slower than dogs, then many of us would be able to reproduce at age seven and live to be 150 years old. Obviously, that's not the case.
Thanks for posting the link! I'm sharing it with dog parent friends. I've seen revisions of the 7-year myth before, but never in such detail. Very enlightening!
For many years, our vets' offices have had a poster that illustrates that it isn't a linear calculation. It starts out being 7 years and changes as dogs age.
So my 14 year old, 80 pound black lab is the equivalent of 88 human years. Darn good since he has all of his teeth, slightly cloudy eyes due to cataracts, no lose of hearing and is still rather jaunty.
He still sleeps through the night without having to get up to pee which is more than I can claim at just 65.
I have a shepard pup who is pushing seven months, and she's starting to hit the preteens. And I thought kids were difficult. I had a calculation of this years ago and it was most useful. Thanks to the Op for posting.
There's something basic about that calculation that I don't get. How can 12 Dog years be the equivalent of 3.3 Human years? Shouldn't it be reversed? Maybe it's because it's early in the morning, but somehow the logic escapes me...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.