Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-22-2010, 07:12 AM
 
Location: San Diego California
6,795 posts, read 7,285,342 times
Reputation: 5194

Advertisements

Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis: Mortgage Mess: Shredding the Dream; Major Fight over Enormous Losses Yet to Come

Great article about how large the mortgage fraud problem really is, and how the taxpayer will eventually be the ones who pay for the criminal banking establishment. Meanwhile the bankers avoid responsibility and continue to live like kings.
It makes you wonder what kind of people stand by, and tolerate this kind of criminal behavior.
Even in Mexico, there are some who try to stand up to the criminal cartels.
Not here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-22-2010, 07:53 AM
 
6,034 posts, read 10,679,063 times
Reputation: 3989
Hey 50% of the culpability for the mortgage mess is on the shoulders of the people who borrowed money they couldn't afford to pay back. The other 50% is on the banks. So laying it all at the feet of the banks is disingenuous at best.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 07:55 AM
 
219 posts, read 562,419 times
Reputation: 190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercury Cougar View Post
Hey 50% of the culpability for the mortgage mess is on the shoulders of the people who borrowed money they couldn't afford to pay back. The other 50% is on the banks. So laying it all at the feet of the banks is disingenuous at best.
I wonder what percentage of people lost their jobs due to outsourcing and that is the reason they lost their house.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 09:21 AM
 
106,577 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
i wonder how many people were able to keep their jobs because their companies out sourced certain things enabling them to stay in business and competitive.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 09:43 AM
 
219 posts, read 562,419 times
Reputation: 190
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
i wonder how many people were able to keep their jobs because their companies out sourced certain things enabling them to stay in business and competitive.....
I wonder how many CEOs/Boards of Directors outsourced not to save money and remain competitive, but to line their pockets with more bonuses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 10:11 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,928,948 times
Reputation: 36644
One by one, you're catching on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 11:50 AM
 
Location: San Diego California
6,795 posts, read 7,285,342 times
Reputation: 5194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercury Cougar View Post
Hey 50% of the culpability for the mortgage mess is on the shoulders of the people who borrowed money they couldn't afford to pay back. The other 50% is on the banks. So laying it all at the feet of the banks is disingenuous at best.
For nearly 15 years the government engineered and economy that rewarded people very generously, to go into debt.
In fact the farther they went into debt, the more they were rewarded.
Some people knew instinctively that this could not work, and would end badly, but being one of those people, I can say it was really hard not to get involved.
I can easily see how people with less financial knowledge would give up after bucking the system for a few years, and just decide to go along.
I would say the division of culpability is more like 60% banks, 35% government and 5% gullible borrowers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2010, 12:57 PM
 
78,335 posts, read 60,527,398 times
Reputation: 49624
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhcom View Post
For nearly 15 years the government engineered and economy that rewarded people very generously, to go into debt.
In fact the farther they went into debt, the more they were rewarded.
Some people knew instinctively that this could not work, and would end badly, but being one of those people, I can say it was really hard not to get involved.
I can easily see how people with less financial knowledge would give up after bucking the system for a few years, and just decide to go along.
I would say the division of culpability is more like 60% banks, 35% government and 5% gullible borrowers.
Most of the people that I know that lost thier houses did so because they gambled heavily or overspent and drained their equity over and over and then hit a rough employment patch and had no savings to rely upon. In a few cases, catastrophic illness without health insurance was the culprit.

California man losing nine homes in mortgage mess | Reuters

Banks facilitated greed, was this guy ripped off or gullible? Nope.
I know some friends that did this too on a smaller scale and are now forced to rent their extra properties they were thinking of flipping for a fast buck.


I DO agree heavily with your comments about the government. Remember too that the old tighter lending restrictions were attacked as racist 10 years ago as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2010, 08:59 AM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,541,357 times
Reputation: 4949
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
One by one, you're catching on.
Amen.

Some slow-pokes around, but I kind of think most folks are starting to get the real picture.

Ain't a purdy picture, but at least it is closer to real.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2010, 09:26 PM
 
3,762 posts, read 5,419,799 times
Reputation: 4832
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercury Cougar View Post
Hey 50% of the culpability for the mortgage mess is on the shoulders of the people who borrowed money they couldn't afford to pay back. The other 50% is on the banks. So laying it all at the feet of the banks is disingenuous at best.
The homeowners didn't create the derivatives that are the true cause of this crisis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top