Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-18-2011, 03:53 PM
 
8,263 posts, read 12,198,208 times
Reputation: 4801

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhcom View Post
Personally it will not affect me that much. I have prepared for what ever happens, but the majority of you are not, and you will be in deep trouble.
Given that you just claimed everyone not in the financial industry is currently getting sodomized, you'll pardon if I dismiss your appraisal of others' life situations as shaky at best.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-19-2011, 01:00 AM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,087,251 times
Reputation: 4365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip T View Post
You do recall how the last Great Depression/Recession ended, no?
It ended with a slow recovery between 1933 and 1940.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 08:21 AM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,546,851 times
Reputation: 4949
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
It ended with a slow recovery between 1933 and 1940.


Now that one is comical.

Just on schedule, on time, due to sound policies, and proper allocation of resources?



Real Deal.

By the time Japan invaded China (1937), and Germany invaded Poland (1939), everyone else was already freaking out and starting huge military build-ups and drafts -- pulling all available labor, materials, and resources into play.

End of Depression.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 11:10 AM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,087,251 times
Reputation: 4365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip T View Post
Now that one is comical.

Just on schedule, on time, due to sound policies, and proper allocation of resources?
If you find history comical...alright. I'm not sure about "on schedule, etc", but the recovery was due to sound policies. Keynes' work was instrumental in understanding the problems during the depression and also understanding how to fix them.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip T View Post
By the time Japan invaded China (1937), and Germany invaded Poland (1939), everyone else was already freaking out and starting huge military build-ups and drafts -- pulling all available labor, materials, and resources into play.
The recovery started well before any build-up from the war, this is just historic fact. By 1936~1937 both GDP and industrial production were back to pre-depressions levels, again just historic fact.

I'm sure none of this matters to you though, you "just know" that the war ended the depression because that is what you've heard many times. It had nothing to do with the economic work of that commie pinko and the policies for FDR.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2011, 02:00 AM
 
6,385 posts, read 11,886,305 times
Reputation: 6874
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
If you find history comical...alright. I'm not sure about "on schedule, etc", but the recovery was due to sound policies. Keynes' work was instrumental in understanding the problems during the depression and also understanding how to fix them.



The recovery started well before any build-up from the war, this is just historic fact. By 1936~1937 both GDP and industrial production were back to pre-depressions levels, again just historic fact.

I'm sure none of this matters to you though, you "just know" that the war ended the depression because that is what you've heard many times. It had nothing to do with the economic work of that commie pinko and the policies for FDR.
Well said. The doomsayers on the internet don't need facts. Why bother with them when you can be a VP candidate without facts? All it takes according to 45% of the American voters is motherly intuition and so-called common sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2011, 11:11 AM
 
Location: San Diego California
6,795 posts, read 7,288,689 times
Reputation: 5194
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
Right, data is only used when it confirms what they want to believe, data is claimed to be manipulated when it doesn't confirm what they want to believe.

These folks have shielded themselves from reality, there is no way to disprove what they are saying as any information that conflicts with they "just know" is disregarded.

I just wish they'd stop spamming the forums.

Sure you do, that is why you spend hours a day following us around the forum like an ankle biting small dogs; trying in vain to disprove everything we say using tricks and propaganda that would make James Carville ashamed.
I certainly hope someone is paying you guys to do this, because it would be kind of strange and pathetic to think you are wasting your own time (regardless of how invaluable it is) to run a disinformation campaign.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2011, 11:54 AM
 
3,076 posts, read 5,650,035 times
Reputation: 2698
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
It ended with a slow recovery between 1933 and 1940.
That is completely false as 1938 and 1938 were just as bad (if not worse) as many of the years in the early 1930's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2011, 03:55 PM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,087,251 times
Reputation: 4365
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhcom View Post
Sure you do, that is why you spend hours a day following us around the forum like an ankle biting small dogs; trying in vain to disprove everything we say using tricks and propaganda that would make James Carville ashamed.
Yes, I spend hours a day to write 1-2 posts (on average) a day on economics forum. And yes, citing data and providing arguments is using "tricks and propaganda". You are demonstrating my point rather well, anybody and anything that conflicts with what you want to believe is shut out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2011, 03:57 PM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,087,251 times
Reputation: 4365
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeavingMA View Post
That is completely false as 1938 and 1938 were just as bad (if not worse) as many of the years in the early 1930's.
No its not, you may want to actually look at the data. There was a recession in 1937, largely attributed to the government trying to cut spending. But the recession in 1937 was nothing like the early 1930's, the unemployment rate was less than half than it was in the early 1930's. The stock market didn't crash, GDP declined just a bit and quickly recovered.

Again just look at the data.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2011, 05:41 PM
 
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
2,221 posts, read 5,290,974 times
Reputation: 1703
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
No its not, you may want to actually look at the data. There was a recession in 1937, largely attributed to the government trying to cut spending. But the recession in 1937 was nothing like the early 1930's, the unemployment rate was less than half than it was in the early 1930's. The stock market didn't crash, GDP declined just a bit and quickly recovered.

Again just look at the data.
Yes, just look at the data. The unemployment data, since the title of this thread is putting the jobs recovery into perspective.

The BLS estimates the UE rate in 1937-38 spiked from 14 to 18%

It would have to have peaked above 36% in the early 30s for the 37-38 data to be, as you state, less than half of what it was in the early 1930s. BLS estimates that UE peaked at ~22% nationwide in 1935.

The UE rate through the entire period from 1932-1939 was higher than any recorded period before or since. From 1941-1944 UE dropped from nearly 15% to just above 1%. A brutal, horrific world war made a great jobs program--and it, not FDR's policy, was responsible for economic recovery from sustained decade-long depressionary UE prints.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhcom
that is why you spend hours a day following us around the forum like an ankle biting small dog; trying in vain to disprove everything we say using tricks and propaganda that would make James Carville ashamed.
Bullseye!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:41 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top