Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-07-2014, 09:46 PM
 
326 posts, read 471,189 times
Reputation: 275

Advertisements

today, countries like USA, UK, Italy, Greece etc are up to there neck (and beyond) in debt and pay huge amounts in interest payment on that debt. why don't countries have a huge reserve (as opposed to debt) and lend that money out so it can run on the interest received on that instead of running on taxing the population ? this way the population will be free from taxation and free to prosper. this will also help the economy grow because 0% tax will attract investors from around the globe. the country would be richer as a result.

kind of like if someone put 10,000,000 in a savings account, and lived off the 1% per annum of interest he/she would get off it ($100,000).

by my calculation, today, the UK spends £682 billion every year, a reserve of £68.2 trillion would be required for the UK to live on a 1% per annum interest alone. in comparison, the US would require $372 trillion. that is alot but for the past 100 or so years, wouldn't that have been plenty of time to build a huge reserve ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-08-2014, 05:25 PM
 
18,802 posts, read 8,471,648 times
Reputation: 4130
Some readings on Modern Money might shed some light.

Modern Monetary Theory Primer - New Economic Perspectives

http://moslereconomics.com/wp-conten...oints/7DIF.pdf

The basis is monetary sovereignty:

–Monetary Sovereignty: The key to understanding economics «#Monetary Sovereignty - Mitchell #Monetary Sovereignty – Mitchell

i.e Why should a monetarily sovereign Gov't/country even have to issue debt?

Abe Lincoln had suggestions:

Abraham Lincoln Quote - Liberty Quotes Blog

As did Henry Ford and Thomas Edison:

Alistair McConnachie Prosperity Thomas Edison debt free money | Prosperity UK

A 12 y/o Canadian girl asks similar questions:


Victoria Grant - YouTube

And I think the answer has to do with money itself as it relates to power in our world. And the fact that bankers wield tremendous power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2014, 08:39 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,977,099 times
Reputation: 36644
As of 2006, here are the top ten countries in terms of gold/foreign exchange per GDP. I put number 11 on the list too, because of its particular importance in the world economy.


Rank Countries Amount
# 1 Libya: $1,182.04 per $1,000 of GDP
# 2 Singapore: $1,031.34
# 3 Lebanon: $844.11
# 4 Botswana: $773.84
# 5 Hong Kong: $695.48
# 6 Algeria: $681.71
# 7 Malaysia: $551.90
# 8 Lesotho: $478.29
# 9 Jordan: $463.45
# 10 Malta: $463.05
# 11 China: $402.16
. . . # 152 United States: $5.24 (second to last, ahead of only Ireland.)

Source: http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/ec...e-gold-per-gdp
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2014, 08:43 AM
 
1,380 posts, read 2,398,227 times
Reputation: 2405
I believe Norway has a very large sum of oil money invested. As for the USA, even ignoring that our entire financial system is built upon the value of government bonds, our political system would demand large tax cuts long before the debt could be paid down. We saw this in the 2000 election, when the debate wasn't evwn about whether or not to have a tax cut, but merely how large and at what marginal rates.

Last edited by eastmemphisguy; 02-09-2014 at 09:03 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2014, 03:14 PM
 
30,897 posts, read 36,958,653 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentry12 View Post
today, countries like USA, UK, Italy, Greece etc are up to there neck (and beyond) in debt and pay huge amounts in interest payment on that debt. why don't countries have a huge reserve (as opposed to debt) and lend that money out so it can run on the interest received on that instead of running on taxing the population ? this way the population will be free from taxation and free to prosper. this will also help the economy grow because 0% tax will attract investors from around the globe. the country would be richer as a result.

kind of like if someone put 10,000,000 in a savings account, and lived off the 1% per annum of interest he/she would get off it ($100,000).

by my calculation, today, the UK spends £682 billion every year, a reserve of £68.2 trillion would be required for the UK to live on a 1% per annum interest alone. in comparison, the US would require $372 trillion. that is alot but for the past 100 or so years, wouldn't that have been plenty of time to build a huge reserve ?
Answer: Because the global banking cartel wants to keep nations and individuals enslaved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 01:04 AM
 
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
10,930 posts, read 11,725,051 times
Reputation: 13170
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentry12 View Post
today, countries like USA, UK, Italy, Greece etc are up to there neck (and beyond) in debt and pay huge amounts in interest payment on that debt. why don't countries have a huge reserve (as opposed to debt) and lend that money out so it can run on the interest received on that instead of running on taxing the population ? this way the population will be free from taxation and free to prosper. this will also help the economy grow because 0% tax will attract investors from around the globe. the country would be richer as a result.

kind of like if someone put 10,000,000 in a savings account, and lived off the 1% per annum of interest he/she would get off it ($100,000).

by my calculation, today, the UK spends £682 billion every year, a reserve of £68.2 trillion would be required for the UK to live on a 1% per annum interest alone. in comparison, the US would require $372 trillion. that is alot but for the past 100 or so years, wouldn't that have been plenty of time to build a huge reserve ?
That would be Norway and the UAE you are referring to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 01:38 PM
 
Location: TX
795 posts, read 1,391,646 times
Reputation: 786
Norway's passive investments are within the government's pension plan. Those investments are held in trust for the benefit of the pension beneficiaries, not the government itself.

There are so many problems with this idea - it's just not even conceivable. You have to let go of the idea that a government can operate like a business or household.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 06:33 PM
 
1,013 posts, read 910,213 times
Reputation: 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentry12 View Post
today, countries like USA, UK, Italy, Greece etc are up to there neck (and beyond) in debt and pay huge amounts in interest payment on that debt. why don't countries have a huge reserve (as opposed to debt) and lend that money out so it can run on the interest received on that instead of running on taxing the population ? this way the population will be free from taxation and free to prosper. this will also help the economy grow because 0% tax will attract investors from around the globe. the country would be richer as a result.

kind of like if someone put 10,000,000 in a savings account, and lived off the 1% per annum of interest he/she would get off it ($100,000).

by my calculation, today, the UK spends £682 billion every year, a reserve of £68.2 trillion would be required for the UK to live on a 1% per annum interest alone. in comparison, the US would require $372 trillion. that is alot but for the past 100 or so years, wouldn't that have been plenty of time to build a huge reserve ?
as others have said.

“Give me control over a nations currency, and I care not who makes its laws.",
the family of ROTHCHILDS
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2014, 06:35 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,420,711 times
Reputation: 55562
suddenly enormous interest in how much people are making who are working. not that the ones inquiring are working intend to work or have worked. as the Millennialists age, a surge of "lets share" is heard throughout the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top