Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-18-2014, 08:56 AM
 
1,690 posts, read 2,060,605 times
Reputation: 993

Advertisements

Since I started looking at my retirement savings account in terms of how many shares could I potentially have of each indexed fund (this year vs last year),

Using the life cycle index fund for the year of my retirement as the benchmark (not US dollars), I notice a better financial improvement due to the new approach of (do not take actions based on what the dollar values are showing because holding dollars is more risky than not holding dollars due to the impact of longterm inflation).

Is my thinking correct here? Instead, I compare index funds against other index funds, and just see Govt Bonds as one of many other indexes that goes up when everything else goes down.

I'm still for the buy low sell high, but what I see as low could be one index fund dropped much faster than the one I'm invested in, and trends are turning so it's time to switch to that index fund. Or the one I'm in rose a lot faster than the other index fund that looks undervalued so time to switch to that index fund. In terms of dollars, this could mean selling out of something that is lower than when you bought it. If there is no tension in the market at all, then I default back to my life cycle diversified index fund. That way you are always doing better than at least one fund when another one is losing, and can buy the losing one on the rebound every time.

Goal is to pick up shares of life cycle fund due to investment gains when excluding any new contributions to the fund...so I can beat the diverse portfolio expected return. I think I can beat the diverse life cycle fund return because I'm confident that 95% of all significant market swings are temporary swings.

Last edited by EricS39; 07-18-2014 at 09:13 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-18-2014, 09:22 AM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,405,433 times
Reputation: 4025
See dollar cost averaging.

To answer your question, both must be considered. If you rebalance your portfolio to keep the correct $$$$ allocation, you are naturally buying low and selling high.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2014, 09:43 AM
 
9,639 posts, read 6,018,049 times
Reputation: 8567
It can't be that hard to beat a life cycle fund over the long term.

I don't buy many funds, but I don't buy any funds that hold other funds. Fees on top of fees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top