Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-15-2014, 05:40 PM
 
31,682 posts, read 40,987,833 times
Reputation: 14430

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by gen811 View Post
tax their property and assets and lets see what happens.
will they sell them and crash the housing market?
maybe, maybe not
They already pay property taxes based on property value. You don't sell investments for the sheer joy of being able to pay capital gains
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-15-2014, 08:30 PM
 
2,804 posts, read 3,167,154 times
Reputation: 2703
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoFigureMeOut View Post
If they start taxing the crap out of everything, what incentive is there to invest?
In the 1970s tax rates were much higher than now. Also investment as a share of GDP was higher too. When tax rates fell in the 1980s so did investment. If anything investment correlates positive with tax rates - the higher the one, the higher the other. Low tax rates encourage ruthless cashing out by the owners, high tax rates encourage them to reinvest their capital and gains back into the economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2014, 08:36 PM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,393,128 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
The High Burden of State and Federal Capital Gains Taxes | Tax Foundation

Really problem solved or new ones created. If we don't sell we aren't paying capital gains. Oh yeah and pension funds taxation? Annuities? Retirement funds? etc etc etc.
I've said in countless threads that increasing the capital gains tax rate to regular income is my prescription AFTER abolishing corporate taxes. I don't agree with corporate taxation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoFigureMeOut View Post
If they start taxing the crap out of everything, what incentive is there to invest?
Unearned income > earned income.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gen811 View Post
tax their property and assets and lets see what happens.
will they sell them and crash the housing market?
maybe, maybe not
no. Taxing encourages them not to sell. They can hold onto everything until they die, and just cough up the estate taxes over to the government. You can't cheat taxes.. you can only defer them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2014, 08:44 PM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,393,128 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Potential_Landlord View Post
In the 1970s tax rates were much higher than now. Also investment as a share of GDP was higher too. When tax rates fell in the 1980s so did investment. If anything investment correlates positive with tax rates - the higher the one, the higher the other. Low tax rates encourage ruthless cashing out by the owners, high tax rates encourage them to reinvest their capital and gains back into the economy.
Bingo!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2014, 08:51 PM
 
152 posts, read 221,178 times
Reputation: 74
Raise the minimum wage. 5 families making $40K each per year buy five loaves of bread, One family making $200K buys one loaf of bread. Also 5 households, 5 means of transportation, etc
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2014, 09:04 PM
 
Location: Upstate NY 🇺🇸
36,754 posts, read 14,784,309 times
Reputation: 35584
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoFigureMeOut View Post
If they start taxing the crap out of everything, what incentive is there to invest?
And with the "wealth" tax many are advocating, there goes the incentive to save.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2014, 09:17 PM
 
893 posts, read 884,103 times
Reputation: 1585
LOL at the tax and spend leftists. Freaking clueless. You people are disgusting
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2014, 09:51 PM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,393,128 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by iowa4430 View Post
LOL at the tax and spend leftists. Freaking clueless. You people are disgusting
We're clueless, but you can't put together a coherent argument devoid of insults.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2014, 10:53 PM
 
2,804 posts, read 3,167,154 times
Reputation: 2703
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delahanty View Post
And with the "wealth" tax many are advocating, there goes the incentive to save.
No there goes the incentive to cash out gains at low tax rates, thus the re-investment of gains becomes much more lucrative at higher taxes, for the benefit of the national economy. Example: tax rate 20% so you save 20% if you invest in your business, tax rate 70% and you save 70% when investing in your business. Cash out at 20% or at 70% taxes. What is the better stimulus? Question: what happened to investment as % of GDP as tax rates declined in the 1980s? Did it go up or down?
(hint: it went down because it became more lucrative for shareholders and owners to cash out gains instead of reinvesting them back into their businesses.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 04:02 AM
 
Location: The Triad
34,090 posts, read 82,763,119 times
Reputation: 43659
Quote:
Originally Posted by Potential_Landlord View Post
No there goes the incentive to cash out gains at low tax rates,
thus the re-investment of gains becomes much more lucrative at higher taxes...
There's some truth to this idea.
Too much of "investing" is little more than churning.

But like the AMT the problem isn't in the tax so much as where it gets applied.
Changing the time reference of "short" vs "long" term for capital gains would do all this just as well.

That would also put the long term rate back in line with the estate taxes where it belongs.
And while we're at it raise the AMT threshold.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top