Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-07-2015, 01:49 PM
 
Location: Sandy Springs, GA
2,281 posts, read 3,032,467 times
Reputation: 2983

Advertisements

You guys are making a political matter out of an economic one. Not even the president and all of Congress have the power to manipulate the economy or unemployment rate at will.

The current economic climate is the culmination of many many years worth of policies and our economic system.

I doubt that anyone could point to a single reason (foreign wars, offshoring and the economic rise of Asian powerhouses, regulatory capture, disparity of wealth & income, etc).... and I doubt that any single individual policy will pull us out of our current slump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-07-2015, 02:07 PM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,572,959 times
Reputation: 16225
Quote:
Originally Posted by eok View Post
In high school we should teach kids to start their own business so they can survive without a job. As jobs become obsolete we do a huge disservice to our kids by pretending they just need to prepare for jobs and spend their time after graduation trying to get one. Our blindness makes them blind, and leaves them sitting ducks to misfortune. Only the brightest can see reality through all the illusion and misunderstanding. You have to see reality to take advantage of it. It gives them a bright future if they see it clearly.
What do you mean? Not everyone can just up and start a business.

Last edited by ncole1; 01-07-2015 at 02:42 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2015, 05:50 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,443,387 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
Maybe it should have read that student debt and personal debt have equal economic drag on those that intend to pay. For the scofflaws, who think paying back a loan is optional, a debt that is subject to being taken through wage garnishment, would be a drag.

Clearly student debt is a greater drag for those who are paying involuntarily because the indebtedness necessarily skyrockets. (My goal is to use "necessarily skyrocket" at least once in every post.)

Today it makes zero sense to be a student loan scofflaw because the financial cost is astronomical. I would be thrilled to have and to exercise the opportunity to make voluntary payments of an equal amount than to have the outrageous fees tacked on indefinitely. Would I pay voluntarily? Absolutely; now I have the capacity to do so.

I have not seen any recent data on this but I would imagine that today's typical student loan defaulter really is financially distressed or else mentally ill - it's just not rational to not pay if you can pay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2015, 05:57 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,443,387 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtab4994 View Post
Exactly. They are going to vote for the party they think will forgive the loans, not the party they think will help them get a job.

Very short-sighted, but that's what we you get from people who spent $250,000 of "imaginary money" on getting a degree in communications.

The party of jobs is more likely to give low-wage workers rents that necessarily skyrocket than to give low-wage workers better jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2015, 06:25 PM
 
3,278 posts, read 5,386,038 times
Reputation: 4072
Young people are generally more liberal. Liberals are miserable.

Makes sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2015, 06:30 PM
 
3,092 posts, read 1,945,272 times
Reputation: 3030
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
Clearly student debt is a greater drag for those who are paying involuntarily because the indebtedness necessarily skyrockets. (My goal is to use "necessarily skyrocket" at least once in every post.)

Today it makes zero sense to be a student loan scofflaw because the financial cost is astronomical. I would be thrilled to have and to exercise the opportunity to make voluntary payments of an equal amount than to have the outrageous fees tacked on indefinitely. Would I pay voluntarily? Absolutely; now I have the capacity to do so.

I have not seen any recent data on this but I would imagine that today's typical student loan defaulter really is financially distressed or else mentally ill - it's just not rational to not pay if you can pay.
I used to be in the student loan business.
I can absolutely confirm that the vast majority of those that have defaulted on the loan cannot afford to pay it back. I would guess that more than 50% cannot even afford the interest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2015, 06:38 PM
i7pXFLbhE3gq
 
n/a posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
1) Student loan debt is easier to collect than non-student consumer debt, e.g. studennt loan debtors can have wages garnished without going through court

2) Student loan debt is generally not dischargeable through bankruptcy while non-student consumer debt is easy to discharge through bankruptcy.
But those are balanced by the ease with which can restructure student debt or even suspend payment in times of economic hardship.

Very few loans offer that kind of flexibility. Try changing the repayment terms of a car loan or a mortgage. Try telling them you can't afford to pay for the next couple of months because you lost your job. Those things will not be easy and may not work at all.

Now do the same thing with a federal student loans. You want to pay over 25 years instead of 10? Call them up and it's done in under ten minutes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2015, 07:04 PM
 
2,236 posts, read 2,975,028 times
Reputation: 3161
Quote:
Originally Posted by dysgenic View Post
I used to be in the student loan business.
I can absolutely confirm that the vast majority of those that have defaulted on the loan cannot afford to pay it back. I would guess that more than 50% cannot even afford the interest.
Why were loans made to individuals without some kind of collateral or ability to pay back the loan? Shouldn't there have been at least a co-signer to insure the loan would be repayed? Don't lenders have a fuduciary responsibility to those whose money is being lent? Aren't these usual and customary lending practices?

As someone who was in the business of making student loans, what are the answers to these questions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2015, 07:09 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,443,387 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonF View Post
But those are balanced by the ease with which can restructure student debt or even suspend payment in times of economic hardship.

Very few loans offer that kind of flexibility. Try changing the repayment terms of a car loan or a mortgage. Try telling them you can't afford to pay for the next couple of months because you lost your job. Those things will not be easy and may not work at all.

Now do the same thing with a federal student loans. You want to pay over 25 years instead of 10? Call them up and it's done in under ten minutes.

??? I'm not seeing the restructuring flexibility of which you speak. I live on a poverty level income and have been unable to restructure my student loan debt. My rent is astronomical and I cannot afford to move into ANYWHERE else because I cannot come up with the upfront costs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2015, 07:12 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,443,387 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by eccotecc View Post
Why were loans made to individuals without some kind of collateral or ability to pay back the loan? Shouldn't there have been at least a co-signer to insure the loan would be repayed? Don't lenders have a fuduciary responsibility to those whose money is being lent? Aren't these usual and customary lending practices?

As someone who was in the business of making student loans, what are the answers to these questions?

There was a time of irrational exuberance in which it was casually assumed that going to college would allow borrowers to earn enough additional income to repay the loans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top