Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-31-2015, 12:28 AM
 
Location: Riverside Ca
22,146 posts, read 33,537,436 times
Reputation: 35437

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
they had deals like 13 months and pay for 12.

Lol marketing at its finest. I'm willing to bet the 12 months were padded to cover that bakers dozen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-31-2015, 02:23 AM
 
106,671 posts, read 108,833,673 times
Reputation: 80159
whatever works , right ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2015, 06:36 AM
 
1,820 posts, read 1,655,018 times
Reputation: 1091
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electrician4you View Post
Lol marketing at its finest. I'm willing to bet the 12 months were padded to cover that bakers dozen.
They were padded to begin with, assuming the ownership group was making a profit. Meanwhile, what really kills profits is empty units. Almost any deal is better than no deal at all. If the market turns in such a way that you have an overhang in units at your standard levels of rents and fees, you start cutting deals. Real actual money-saving deals. 2008-09 were such years, as increased uncertainty made people wary of any actual commitment. By 2010 however, a shift from ownership to the rental market had built up steam and strong demand for rental units made deals unnecessary. At least that's what I was able to observe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2015, 07:02 AM
 
106,671 posts, read 108,833,673 times
Reputation: 80159
here in nyc we have a rental shortgage. thanks to rent stabilization not one middle class rental has been put up since the 1970's. only special projects , affordable housing or things with income restrictions were put up on the rental side.

co-ops and condo's were built along with luxury rentals . so rents are increasing way beyond the rate of inflation.

the irony is we own co-ops in manhattan with rent stabilized tenants yet live in a stabilized building ourselves in queens.

my wife has been here 35 years but with all the capital improvements we are not much below market at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:02 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top