Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-26-2015, 10:44 AM
 
Location: Liminal Space
1,023 posts, read 1,551,060 times
Reputation: 1324

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOverdog View Post
In many cities that are posters for the bubble, (LA, SF, Seattle, Vancouver, etc) the majority rent, and more single families are being demolished for multifamily, pushing single family prices up even more.
I don't know how SF would be defined as a poster child for the bubble. SF is a city where the bubble barely happened, relative to other cities. The median sales price topped out around 800k in 2007, and hit bottom just above 600k in 2011-2012 - a 25% drop.

Real Estate Market Trends for San Francisco, CA - Trulia

Compare to Las Vegas, which peaked at 306k in 2007 and bottomed out at 110k in 2012 - a 64% drop.

Real Estate Market Trends for Las Vegas, NV - Trulia

Or how about Stockton, dropping from 395k to 112k - a 72% decline.

Real Estate Market Trends for Stockton, CA - Trulia

Those cities are the poster children of the housing bubble.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-26-2015, 01:34 PM
 
5,263 posts, read 6,398,312 times
Reputation: 6229
Quote:
The median sales price topped out around 800k in 2007, and hit bottom just above 600k in 2011-2012 - a 25% drop.
You are right, but many people, when speaking of the housing bubble, only mean that houses cost a lot more than they think they should, and SF is definitely the poster child for that. How often do you hear something like "OMG, a shack in the SF area costs $800k for 1200 sq feet? Those people are suckers, and where I live that same place could be bought for pocket lint and a slightly chilled Coke. The US is definitely still in a housing bubble!"

And SF is still bubbling because of tech bubble/foreign investor bubble/easy interest rate bubble/etc, and will pop any year now. And then houses in SF will cost how much they think they should.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 03:39 PM
 
1,820 posts, read 1,653,852 times
Reputation: 1091
Home prices anywhere are decided between a willing buyer and a willing seller. There really isn't much more to it than that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2015, 11:27 PM
 
22,653 posts, read 24,571,809 times
Reputation: 20319
It's a mixed bag........home prices in SOME areas are well-past the peak of the last housing bubble. Other areas, probably the less-desirable areas, are not yet bubbling-up, again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2015, 08:21 AM
 
Location: TN/NC
35,051 posts, read 31,251,460 times
Reputation: 47508
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
There may be some places without good jobs fitting that. In Detroit the current median home price is $40k, and was over $50k in 2000. At the bottom it was $31k, but that was not until 2012. It's actually coming up but still thrown off by the $500 house that they can't give away.

We are now above the bubble peak, but have good high tech salaries, making the median household income above $130k, and the demand for more homes very high as more people are hired.
I think Detroit is kind of a poor example. While the city proper is in the crapper, the surrounding suburbs remain attractive. You don't see such a sharp contrast in virtually any other area I can think of.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2015, 09:37 AM
 
1,820 posts, read 1,653,852 times
Reputation: 1091
Detroit suburbs were up 15% year-over-year in May. In the city proper, the year-to-date median sales price through April was $1,125 in zip code 48211, and under $5,000 in 48210 and 48213. The city is obviously a special case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2015, 09:42 AM
 
5,263 posts, read 6,398,312 times
Reputation: 6229
Quote:
Home prices anywhere are decided between a willing buyer and a willing seller.
No.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2015, 11:17 AM
 
1,820 posts, read 1,653,852 times
Reputation: 1091
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOverdog View Post
No.
How do YOU think it works, Professor? Did Obama's Death Panels all turn into Home Price Decider panels? Give me a break...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2015, 11:24 AM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,570,971 times
Reputation: 16225
Quote:
Originally Posted by ContrarianEcon View Post
I read a Wall Street Journal article yesterday that talked about how 54% of the houses in this one working class community in Ga were upside down.

This one person's story was told where at the peak of the last bubble their house was valued at $350k or about that. They owed $172k and the house was recently appraised at $50k it was originally bought at $80k before the bubble.

The article said that wages hadn't come up and that house prices weren't going to recover any time soon each foreclosure put more downwards pressure on house prices the poor working class people weren't good credit risks and the wages weren't there to pay for the houses.

If you want to push the values of houses above the peak of the last bubble and have them stay there then you need the wages to pay for them. A $30 an hr minimum wage would do that. There are a lot of houses that are in bad shape out there. A big jump in the minimum wage even spread out over time would be disruptive to the economy but the alternative would be worse.

Just something to think about.
"One working class community" is the key phrase here. A single working-class community does not a widespread problem make!

I think there have always been, and will always be, isolated areas where this sort of thing happens. Industries do come and go, and buying an expensive home in an area that is entirely supported by a single factory or industry is, as a general matter, a big gamble.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2015, 08:32 PM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,383,522 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
Can you post a link to the house with a 350k house in08 and now appraising for 50k I'd be interested to see what damage the house has sustained over the last 7 years
Pay wall. It was in the wall street journal the day before I posted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top