Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should we have a $200 or $500 bill?
Yes, both a $200 bill and a $500 bill 16 19.05%
Yes, but only a $500 bill 15 17.86%
Yes, but only a $200 bill 3 3.57%
No, things are fine as they are. 50 59.52%
Voters: 84. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-25-2016, 07:31 PM
 
Location: Maine
1,151 posts, read 2,036,888 times
Reputation: 1848

Advertisements

The European Union currently has a €500 bill (about $542 US) as its highest denomination in circulation. The United States only goes up to $100 nowadays, although back a few decades ago, we had a $500, a $1000, and higher, when the dollar was worth a lot more.

I can think of a few transactions where higher denominations would be useful. A family of four going to the grocery store, for one. A $200 bill would probably roughly equate to a weeks' worth of groceries. Many common consumer electronics purchases would be well served by a $200 as well. I think a new Playstation 4 or XBox 1 costs around $300 or so. Televisions run anywhere from $100 to $5,000. And of course, it's hard to get out of an auto repair shop these days for less than $200.

The idea of money is that it is supposed to facilitate the exchange of goods and services, and with things costing what they do these days, I think some denominations higher than $100 are in order.

What do you all think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-25-2016, 07:37 PM
 
Location: Riverside Ca
22,146 posts, read 33,513,828 times
Reputation: 35437
I don't see any point in it. Most don't carry that much cash around anyway. I carry about $100 tops. Anything else I have a CC
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2016, 07:46 PM
 
Location: Minnesota
1,548 posts, read 912,764 times
Reputation: 1413
I was fascinated by those high denominational bills when I was a kid. The $500, $1000 and there was a $10,000 but only for banks I believe. I'd like to just have one, not for spending.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2016, 09:13 PM
 
Location: Clinton Township, MI
1,901 posts, read 1,828,387 times
Reputation: 2329
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoastalMaineiac View Post
.....The idea of money is that it is supposed to facilitate the exchange of goods and services, and with things costing what they do these days, I think some denominations higher than $100 are in order.

What do you all think?
I don't carry ANY cash. I only carry credit cards as they offer the best form of protection for your money in terms of if you get your wallet stolen or if you order something from a business and don't receive it.

With that being said, I see any reason for why people should be carrying around so much cash, so I don't support a $200 or $500 bill. The $100 bill is "bad enough".

Matter of fact, come to think of it, I can't tell the LAST TIME I even touched any cash
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2016, 09:35 PM
 
4,286 posts, read 10,764,282 times
Reputation: 3810
$500 bill would be nice for larger cash transactions.

Carrying 20+ hundreds for some transactions which are not that big is kind of stupid. $200 would be a bit redundant and unnecessary though imo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2016, 09:39 PM
 
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
10,352 posts, read 7,980,919 times
Reputation: 27758
It's next to impossible to spend a $100 bill these days; many stores won't take them. What would be the point of an even bigger bill that can't be readily spent?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2016, 09:43 PM
 
Location: Maine
1,151 posts, read 2,036,888 times
Reputation: 1848
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aredhel View Post
It's next to impossible to spend a $100 bill these days; many stores won't take them. What would be the point of an even bigger bill that can't be readily spent?
I don't think I've ever run into a store that would refuse a $100 bill for a purchase in that ballpark. The corner gas station isn't going to break a hundred for a 50¢ stick of gum, but they'd be silly to refuse it in the case of, say, a trucker filling up with diesel fuel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2016, 10:03 PM
 
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
10,352 posts, read 7,980,919 times
Reputation: 27758
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoastalMaineiac View Post
I don't think I've ever run into a store that would refuse a $100 bill for a purchase in that ballpark.
I've run into quite a few of them, and the reason is the risk to the merchant of accepting counterfeit currency. If a person is paying using multiple small bills, it's unlikely they will all be counterfeit, so the risk of loss to the merchant is less.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2016, 10:03 PM
 
Location: Jamestown, NY
7,840 posts, read 9,195,604 times
Reputation: 13779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electrician4you View Post
I don't see any point in it. Most don't carry that much cash around anyway. I carry about $100 tops. Anything else I have a CC
Agreed. I generally don't even carry that much except maybe when I'm traveling and I'm not sure how easy it would be to find an ATM if I need to get cash. Even when I don't want to put a purchase on credit, like at a grocery store, debit cards work fine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2016, 10:03 PM
 
Location: Maine
1,151 posts, read 2,036,888 times
Reputation: 1848
Quote:
Originally Posted by GiantRutgersfan View Post
... $200 would be a bit redundant and unnecessary though imo.
Not any more so than the quarter, the two dollar bill, or the twenty dollar bill, in my opinion. 1, 2, 5, 10, and so on is a pretty common pattern for money denominations, because having two in the pattern reduces the "cost" of making change to no more than two of any single denomination of money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top