Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-14-2016, 09:22 AM
 
Location: Jamestown, NY
7,840 posts, read 9,197,833 times
Reputation: 13779

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ContrarianEcon View Post
The roaring twenties. That is what they were called.
Exactly. The recessions in the 20s were very minor blips. The prosperity started to unravel late in the decade, but earlier, most people had jobs and were buying things like houses, cars, and radios.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-16-2016, 06:39 AM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,581,120 times
Reputation: 16235
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheWayISeeThings View Post
Do we have the ability to feed the entire population if we were to stop importing food? That's a serious question.
Easily. Plant food takes 1/10th the land as animal food. Jack up the price of animal foods and it will work. (No, I'm not vegetarian).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2016, 12:34 PM
 
Location: Ruidoso, NM
5,667 posts, read 6,593,451 times
Reputation: 4817
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
Easily. Plant food takes 1/10th the land as animal food. Jack up the price of animal foods and it will work. (No, I'm not vegetarian).
Just end the subsidies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2016, 12:37 PM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,384,773 times
Reputation: 768
A trade war benefits the net importer and hurts the net exporter. What is our balance of trade? Last information I had was we were running a trade deficit with 128 of our trading partners, but hat was several years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2016, 09:07 PM
 
Location: Ruidoso, NM
5,667 posts, read 6,593,451 times
Reputation: 4817
$500B per year deficit is the latest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2016, 10:27 AM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,384,773 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by andywire View Post
Some things, you just can't print, propagate, or fake. Like real, legitimate economic growth, prosperity, rising standards of living...

Manipulation got us this far.
A better answer...


The trick is to set up the regulatory system so that growth happens where it is productive, where it leads to real standard of living going up, etc.


Currently the velocity of money is dropping like a rock. The last time it dropped like this was in the 1930's. Printing money to balance the falling velocity is a tricky game. Where to get the money moving and how to get it moving. Negative interest rates on one hand or upping the minimum wage on the other.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2016, 10:10 PM
 
Location: Ruidoso, NM
5,667 posts, read 6,593,451 times
Reputation: 4817
Quote:
Originally Posted by ContrarianEcon View Post
The trick is to set up the regulatory system so that growth happens where it is productive, where it leads to real standard of living going up, etc.
Precisely. Tech, invention, and innovation are what drive productivity and living standards. You support those activities, provide a stable playing field, and spread the wealth. Prosperity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2016, 09:51 AM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,384,773 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by rruff View Post
Precisely. Tech, invention, and innovation are what drive productivity and living standards. You support those activities, provide a stable playing field, and spread the wealth. Prosperity.
It is the nature of the top or a part of the top to grow at the expense of everyone else. Constraining the growth of this part a bit does everyone some good. Spread the wealth, We've spread our jobs all over the planet, let us spread our pay as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2016, 05:25 PM
 
Location: *
13,242 posts, read 4,922,871 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by rruff View Post
Consumer capitalism requires that productivity gains are shared. Eventually. Productivity gains have been going to only a tiny fraction since ~1980. If you go back far enough you can see that imbalances between wages and productivity built up until the '29 crisis, and from then til the '70s it was corrected. Since then we've had an unprecedented nearly flat wage while productivity and GDP/capita have kept rising at the 200 year normal pace.

So you may expect a long period of "correction" to happen again. But it isn't, and I don't believe it will. The paradigm since 1980 has been deficit trade (globalization), and debt escalation to fill the consumption hole. By now all the big corporations have a large global presence, and they no longer care about US consumers, but rather global consumption. The developing world is the low hanging fruit. Screw the US public.

Fixing our problems is no-brainer easy. The issue is that the solutions involve changes that do not fit in with our overlords' plans, and so they won't happen. None of this would have happened in the first place if the people running things cared about the US public. All these policies have given us is a load of debt and flat wages.
Extremely well said. Thanks & respect, I appreciate.

The more recent global financial imbroglio is more evidence that, as you've noted, the folks running things have been indifferent to the US public since the 1980s & with the momentum building ever since. Adding insult to injury, the 'bailouts' went to servicing debts escalated to fill the consumption hole.

Too big to fail? Too big to care.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rruff
If you want to figure out what will happen, ponder the steps that will result in the super rich being able to keep getting richer. I doubt they want a massive crisis since I don't see how they'd profit from it collectively. And they *have* been acting collectively since ~1980.

More likely we'll keep stumbling along until AI makes consumer-capitalism obsolete.
More agreement here. They've been acting collectively since 1980s & have been dividing the rest of us, by creating false dichotomies. Thus divided, we've become a very easy conquest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top