Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-10-2016, 11:17 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
30,348 posts, read 19,122,995 times
Reputation: 26227

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rruff View Post
Demand = People with money to spend. In the US, per capita GDP has risen about 100% in the last 40 years, while consumer wages have been flat. Demand has a lot of catching up to do!

What forces are going to persuade the oligarchs to dig into the piles of cash they are sitting on, and invest the $$$ in production and wages for the masses?

Automation and AI are going to make this game (consumer-capitalism) obsolete before long. Demand is not going to catch up. Ever. They've spent 40 years systematically destroying demand, and that was no accident.
I agree wages should increase and support raising the min wage. High taxation of corporate profits is an impediment to corporations spending their money as is currently the oversuppply compared to the demand...there is no way to artificially correct supply and demand forces that will last...supply versus demand will always determine the prices long term.

Regarding automation and AI impacts, what do you suggest? Demand will always be there for the right product at the right time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-11-2016, 03:33 AM
 
4,231 posts, read 3,555,592 times
Reputation: 2207
Quote:
Originally Posted by rruff View Post
Highly developed countries won't be seeing 5% growth, but less developed ones... sure.

Global GDP is doing pretty decent really. 3% isn't bad.


India contributing more than EU

Unbelievable!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2016, 03:55 AM
 
Location: Northern Maine
10,428 posts, read 18,671,339 times
Reputation: 11563
We have 95,000,000 adults between 18 and 65 not working. The only ting preventing growth is government. We will have growth again when we force government to get out of he way. Massive government bureaucracy and regulations stifle growth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2016, 11:08 AM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,383,522 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by rruff View Post
Demand = People with money to spend. In the US, per capita GDP has risen about 100% in the last 40 years, while consumer wages have been flat. Demand has a lot of catching up to do!

What forces are going to persuade the oligarchs to dig into the piles of cash they are sitting on, and invest the $$$ in production and wages for the masses?

Automation and AI are going to make this game (consumer-capitalism) obsolete before long. Demand is not going to catch up. Ever. They've spent 40 years systematically destroying demand, and that was no accident.
Quote:
Originally Posted by richrf View Post
The problems that the world economies are experiencing are due to a greater and greater concentration of wealth. It is not a growth problem.
Two ways of saying the same thing. There was talk of going back to the gold standard. What shut that talk down was this. We've got the world's gold. We go on the gold standard we ship the gold over seas, we are broke. We go off the gold standard. What we have is a de facto labor standard. It is $7.25 is worth one hour of unskilled labor. We just need to make it an international standard. That way our productivity competes with their cheap labor more evenly.




Tax the producer of labor even if it is a machine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2016, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Chicago
5,559 posts, read 4,626,388 times
Reputation: 2202
Quote:
Originally Posted by ContrarianEcon View Post
Two ways of saying the same thing. There was talk of going back to the gold standard. What shut that talk down was this. We've got the world's gold. We go on the gold standard we ship the gold over seas, we are broke. We go off the gold standard. What we have is a de facto labor standard. It is $7.25 is worth one hour of unskilled labor. We just need to make it an international standard. That way our productivity competes with their cheap labor more evenly.




Tax the producer of labor even if it is a machine.
Primarily we have to bring back Glass- Steagall. With that back in place, the Fed Reserve gravey train for Wall Street immediately ends and everyone on Wall Street has to onece again learn to work for a living.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2016, 11:13 AM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,383,522 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.Thomas View Post
India contributing more than EU

Unbelievable!!
Not if you look at it. If you go from $1 a day to $1 an hr. that is 8X as much pay. You still can't buy anything with it though. If you want to get large growth in GWP (gross world product) raising the wages of the third world will get you more bang for the buck that anywhere else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2016, 11:19 AM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,383,522 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by richrf View Post
Primarily we have to bring back Glass- Steagall. With that back in place, the Fed Reserve gravey train for Wall Street immediately ends and everyone on Wall Street has to onece again learn to work for a living.
That is a good start. But just a start. Making them accountable for the mistakes at this point will just hurt everyone as they go broke and stop loaning out more money. The real need is to make everyone whole. That means restoring to the bottom the wealth transferred to the top. And because we've gone global instead of just national that means upping the wages of the third world to our standard and having them be productive enough to support those wages. AI and automation are an issue that need to be addressed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2016, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Chicago
5,559 posts, read 4,626,388 times
Reputation: 2202
Quote:
Originally Posted by ContrarianEcon View Post
That is a good start. But just a start. Making them accountable for the mistakes at this point will just hurt everyone as they go broke and stop loaning out more money. The real need is to make everyone whole. That means restoring to the bottom the wealth transferred to the top. And because we've gone global instead of just national that means upping the wages of the third world to our standard and having them be productive enough to support those wages. AI and automation are an issue that need to be addressed.
The problem right now is that the money-people have no incentive to build real businesses and hire and maintain good people. They get all the free money they want so the whole economic is distorted. I was part of the game so I saw it first hand. Once the incentives are properly in place again, everything begins to flow correctly. It does no good to have a higher minimum wage if the money people don't even need employees to make $billions. Everything is out of whack because there is an endless flow of free money from the Fed to the Billionaire Class thanks to the repeal of Glass-Steagall. That is why the Bankers worked so hard to get it repealed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2016, 11:34 AM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,383,522 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by richrf View Post
The problem right now is that the money-people have no incentive to build real businesses and hire and maintain good people. They get all the free money they want so the whole economic is distorted. I was part of the game so I saw it first hand. Once the incentives are properly in place again, everything begins to flow correctly. It does no good to have a higher minimum wage if the money people don't even need employees to make $billions. Everything is out of whack because there is an endless flow of free money from the Fed to the Billionaire Class thanks to the repeal of Glass-Steagall. That is why the Bankers worked so hard to get it repealed.
Point taken.


But upping the minimum wage would spread the free money from the FED across the bottom to. What is good for the top should be good for the bottom to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2016, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Chicago
5,559 posts, read 4,626,388 times
Reputation: 2202
Quote:
Originally Posted by ContrarianEcon View Post
Point taken.


But upping the minimum wage would spread the free money from the FED across the bottom to. What is good for the top should be good for the bottom to.
A bit, but not enough to make an overall difference. What we need is $30/hr jobs and that is not going to happen until the right incentives are in place and we have labor unions that are really aligned with the workers and not management. Lots of work needs to be done. It all unraveled over the last two decades.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:21 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top