Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-11-2016, 10:33 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
Not if the rates go negative sufficiently slowly.
Oh but they are absolutely worried about this.

Once they open this Pandora's Box there is no going back.
They do not know what will happen if negative rates are pushed on customers.

The "they" being the economists and bankers that live and breath this stuff.

Coincidentally currency circulation has gone up in those countries that now have NIRP..Japan, Denmark and Switzerland. Not that the money is being spent but that the money is no longer being held in the bank.

Once that capital flight starts you cannot stop the flow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-11-2016, 10:35 AM
 
19,632 posts, read 12,226,539 times
Reputation: 26428
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
Not if the rates go negative sufficiently slowly.
Yes and at the same time electronic payments slowly become the norm, larger denomination bills are quietly discontinued, fees incrementally increase, etc., and then you suddenly realize the frog has been boiled. Just watch Europe, that is how it is done.

Having savings for your rainy day, or for some kind of future investment is something to be discouraged and punished. Because you might be a drug dealer or terrorist? Please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2016, 11:49 AM
 
Location: Cleveland and Columbus OH
11,052 posts, read 12,452,032 times
Reputation: 10385
Ask the Japanese.

Or wait 1 year here.

You'll know it when you see it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2016, 12:07 PM
 
9,837 posts, read 4,636,611 times
Reputation: 7292
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowtired14 View Post
Maybe I'm not too bright, but exactly what does a negative interest rate mean? I understand it's a stimulus method to discourage money hoarding, but what does that mean to both borrowers and savers? For a borrower, does that mean a bank pays me to borrow? As a saver would that imply penalties for saving?
currently the neg rates apply to BANKS, putting money in central banks etc.

It is an inter-bank issue intended to encourage the banks to put monies to work


We simply can't have RETAIL neg interest rates , without having mass withdrawals and perhaps causing an actual run on banks.


SO what do neg rates mean to consumers. It means that nothing else has worked. nothing else has forced money to go to work rather than rest safely in a vault.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2016, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilcart View Post
currently the neg rates apply to BANKS, putting money in central banks etc.

It is an inter-bank issue intended to encourage the banks to put monies to work


We simply can't have RETAIL neg interest rates , without having mass withdrawals and perhaps causing an actual run on banks.


SO what do neg rates mean to consumers. It means that nothing else has worked. nothing else has forced money to go to work rather than rest safely in a vault.
Because there is no stability. This bogus recovery is going on 7 years old now (recession officially over June 2009). Data calculations have been modified always resulting in "better numbers".
The GDP calculation got fudge enough to bump it up 3% vs reality.

And if you read foreign news other countries are doing the same.

Lots of creative accounting to bolster positive GDP numbers.

And the people aren't fooled anymore. So they are paying down debt and saving their money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2016, 01:13 PM
 
Location: Liminal Space
1,023 posts, read 1,552,147 times
Reputation: 1324
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowtired14 View Post
So, if I understand, it will cost me money to put my money in the bank, better to keep it at home (just sayin'), so I have $100 to save

Then, I borrow money from the bank, let's say $100, but I only need to pay back $99 next month

Why not borrow $100 every month, pay back the $99 every month, pocket the $1, I'd be making 12% annual return, right?
Rates are not going to go down to -12%. -0.1% or so is a more likely starting point.

Negative interest rate loans are not going to be available to bank customers, just as ZIRP did not cause zero interest rate loans to be available to bank customers. ZIRP cause interest rates for borrowers to go very low, such as 3% mortgages and 2% car loans, but no one is getting 0% mortgages or car loans (except maybe for introductory rates, but those have always been around).

As for the questions on "bank run" - Yes that is precisely the point. The Gov't wants us to get our money out of the banks and put it in stocks, bonds, real estate, buy a new washing machine or car or flat screen TV, or just do something with it other than leave it sitting in a bank.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2016, 01:18 PM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,385,439 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Wrong kind of Inflation.
Depends on where you are looking at things from!!!



From the top down I'd agree with you. From the bottom up?


Wages are 45% of GDP so double wages and you only have to increase the cost of everything by 45% to cover the expense of the higher wages. 2x the wages for an increase of 1.45x the cost to cover it. How greedy will the top be? Put a 90% tax on the top and they can be as greedy as they want as long as it gets rolled over into a basic income. From the bottom up driving inflation with wages looks good to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2016, 01:52 PM
 
19,029 posts, read 27,599,679 times
Reputation: 20271
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowtired14 View Post
So, if I understand, it will cost me money to put my money in the bank, better to keep it at home (just sayin'), so I have $100 to save

Then, I borrow money from the bank, let's say $100, but I only need to pay back $99 next month

Why not borrow $100 every month, pay back the $99 every month, pocket the $1, I'd be making 12% annual return, right?
$100 x 12 months= $1200. $12 ($1 x 12 months)= 1%
Then you have to pay income tax on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2016, 02:01 PM
 
19,632 posts, read 12,226,539 times
Reputation: 26428
Quote:
Originally Posted by bentobox34 View Post
Rates are not going to go down to -12%. -0.1% or so is a more likely starting point.

Negative interest rate loans are not going to be available to bank customers, just as ZIRP did not cause zero interest rate loans to be available to bank customers. ZIRP cause interest rates for borrowers to go very low, such as 3% mortgages and 2% car loans, but no one is getting 0% mortgages or car loans (except maybe for introductory rates, but those have always been around).

As for the questions on "bank run" - Yes that is precisely the point. The Gov't wants us to get our money out of the banks and put it in stocks, bonds, real estate, buy a new washing machine or car or flat screen TV, or just do something with it other than leave it sitting in a bank.
They are not hoarding it for convenience, they are worried about their potential layoffs, another massive recession, and what they will live on if/when the s... really hits the fan. The year 2008 was not that long ago. The problems haven't really been solved. Now we have a volatile election year on top of everything else. So, Simon says go buy a boat with your life savings? Now? Invest like you did in 2007? Some of us bought houses right before the crash. If my mother had invested as her trusted bank advised her in 2006 she would have lost everything and been in the poor house in her old age.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2016, 03:00 PM
 
3,910 posts, read 9,471,842 times
Reputation: 1959
Quote:
Originally Posted by bentobox34 View Post
Rates are not going to go down to -12%. -0.1% or so is a more likely starting point.

Negative interest rate loans are not going to be available to bank customers, just as ZIRP did not cause zero interest rate loans to be available to bank customers. ZIRP cause interest rates for borrowers to go very low, such as 3% mortgages and 2% car loans, but no one is getting 0% mortgages or car loans (except maybe for introductory rates, but those have always been around).

As for the questions on "bank run" - Yes that is precisely the point. The Gov't wants us to get our money out of the banks and put it in stocks, bonds, real estate, buy a new washing machine or car or flat screen TV, or just do something with it other than leave it sitting in a bank.
Wow. I completely agree with you. Saving used to be encouraged and rewarded years ago with high interest bearing savings accounts. Today, parking your money in a 0% savings account nets you a 3% loss annually due to inflation. Additionally, bank fees greatly outweigh interest.

In order for savers to compensate, they are forced to move their money into risky investment accounts hoping they achieve a high enough % return to keep pace. Even a 5% annual return in stocks may not be enough to offset losses since you get hit with capital gains taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top