Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-28-2016, 02:41 PM
 
Location: Myrtle Creek, Oregon
15,293 posts, read 17,669,308 times
Reputation: 25231

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by gunslinger256 View Post
I would disagree.

Our current state of economic doldrums are clearly rooted in early 2000/2001.

Doesn't matter which administration was at the helm since or during. All I know is everything changed around 2001.

It may not be a result of 9-11 but for me, working has never been the same since that event.

increased outsourcing, increased work loads, maximum 2% raises if I was lucky enough to get a raise that year, but the rich continued to get richer.

I don't understand why politicians are still trying to protect the tax increases for the rich.
We had to pay for the wars some way. In this case it was indirect. The feds borrowed over $1 trillion to finance their military adventurism, and spent much of that money overseas. Among other things, they had to maintain our 700 military bases in other countries, and in many cases we spent $billions expanding them. Much of that money was sucked out of US business investment, which resulted in a stagnant economy and a recession that caused a lot of pain.

The WTC was a great rallying point, but it was a pretty minor attack. We have killed a lot more Americans as a matter of US foreign policy than the Saudis managed in NYC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-28-2016, 03:04 PM
 
4,231 posts, read 3,555,592 times
Reputation: 2207
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Caldwell View Post
We had to pay for the wars some way. In this case it was indirect. The feds borrowed over $1 trillion to finance their military adventurism, and spent much of that money overseas. Among other things, they had to maintain our 700 military bases in other countries, and in many cases we spent $billions expanding them. Much of that money was sucked out of US business investment, which resulted in a stagnant economy and a recession that caused a lot of pain.

The WTC was a great rallying point, but it was a pretty minor attack. We have killed a lot more Americans as a matter of US foreign policy than the Saudis managed in NYC.
I think Saudi card will eventually be played.

It can't be ignored that long
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2016, 04:27 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,150,494 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.Thomas View Post
Great piece by Larry Kudlow

Two-percent growth is a loser for the angry middle class

2% growth is a total joke for small businesses and middle class

And i don't even believe in this 2%.
Prove that a 4th Level Economy should grow faster/higher than 2%.

Again, look at the data for the US for GDP growth:

2000-2010 10-Year Avg 1.68%
1990-2010 20-Year Avg 2.55%
1980-2010 30-Year Avg 2.79%
1970-2010 40-Year Avg 2.89%
1960-2010 50-Year Avg 3.16%


1961-1970 4.22% (Expansion of 3rd Level Economy/Transition to 4th Level Economy)
1971-1980 3.21%
1981-1990 3.27%
1991-2000 3.41% (Expansion of 4th Level Economy with no Transition to 5th Level Economy)
2001-2010. 1.68%

Average 2.89%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2016, 04:35 PM
 
4,231 posts, read 3,555,592 times
Reputation: 2207
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Prove that a 4th Level Economy should grow faster/higher than 2%.

Again, look at the data for the US for GDP growth:

2000-2010 10-Year Avg 1.68%
1990-2010 20-Year Avg 2.55%
1980-2010 30-Year Avg 2.79%
1970-2010 40-Year Avg 2.89%
1960-2010 50-Year Avg 3.16%


1961-1970 4.22% (Expansion of 3rd Level Economy/Transition to 4th Level Economy)
1971-1980 3.21%
1981-1990 3.27%
1991-2000 3.41% (Expansion of 4th Level Economy with no Transition to 5th Level Economy)
2001-2010. 1.68%

Average 2.89%
I think for US we need at least 3%

And what is the 5th level
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2016, 04:41 PM
 
Location: Orange County, CA
4,898 posts, read 3,357,279 times
Reputation: 2974
Economic recoveries have been getting weaker...

While recessions are getting nastier...

Not surprised in the least...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2016, 04:43 PM
 
4,231 posts, read 3,555,592 times
Reputation: 2207
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lycanmaster View Post
Economic recoveries have been getting weaker...

While recessions are getting nastier...

Not surprised in the least...
So true

I couldn't express better.

Recoveries are not even feeling like recoveries

We need at least couple of years with growth at 5% to feel better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2016, 04:51 PM
 
24,555 posts, read 18,225,831 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vacanegro View Post
Taxes on most of the middle class working population in the US are high enough

Here is a sample of what I pay

35% federal
6% state
SS 6%
1% on property value/yr
4.5 % PPT (Car Tax/yr)
5.1% on gas
7% sales tax

of course I get credits that reduce the Fed rate to maybe 22% but by any measure that is quite enough in taxes and hat does not include the tolls I pay to drive to work ($6/day)


I prefer not to be in Europe where folks regularly pay 50% income taxes and on top of that they get VAT of 15-20% put on most purchases (not usually food in a grocery store). Although, one could argue the tax burden is similar compared to CA, NY or some high tax places.
You've just blown all your credibility. There isn't a middle class person in the United States paying 35% of their gross income in Federal income taxes. $200K, single, standard deduction is a bit less than 24%.

My 2015 effective tax rate was 24%. I think it's my societal duty as one of the fortunate 5%ers to pay my fair share. Why are you so greedy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2016, 05:19 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
32 posts, read 27,805 times
Reputation: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
You've just blown all your credibility. There isn't a middle class person in the United States paying 35% of their gross income in Federal income taxes. $200K, single, standard deduction is a bit less than 24%.

My 2015 effective tax rate was 24%. I think it's my societal duty as one of the fortunate 5%ers to pay my fair share. Why are you so greedy?

Based on my back of envelope calculation. if that person actually had 35% federal income tax on gross income, they have to make slightly more than a million (using 2015 tax brackets and single filer).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2016, 06:20 PM
 
Location: Savannah
2,099 posts, read 2,274,543 times
Reputation: 1336
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Exactly ^^^

Democrats don't understand human nature.

No thank you. Let the poor employ the poor.
Clearly they don't. Republicans have a better marketing department. I'm sure it pays better, which of course makes sense they attract more skilled marketers. It's economics. And they have to. To convince the plebs to vote to make the rich richer, and continue believing Fox. Including the out of context soundbite about building things.

GeoffD well played. Most people, regardless of party, probably couldn't even name what bracket they're in. It's surprising to me also that most people pay hundreds for someone to do their taxes. You learn a lot by doing them yourself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2016, 06:52 PM
 
50 posts, read 47,652 times
Reputation: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
When people get their paycheck their eye goes straight to take home pay (now how much is deposited into their bank account). They ignore how much the federal government takes. It is a withholding, pay-as-you-go, system is a system where smaller amounts are taken before the worker even gets their money and the company you work for is a unpaid tax collector.

I'll bet! if people had to pay quarterly taxes like business owners do they would pay more attention to how much government takes.

People demand higher pays but never look at the other side of the coin. It's better for the gov to take less and let people keep money they already worked to earn. Of course the government wants you to ignore this, they want you to make higher wages instead of reducing taxes, that means they get more of your money.
This HITS the nail on the head and is the exact reason why more aren't up in arms. In fact, there are those duped into thinking they actually 'get' money from the government in the form of tax refunds. Somehow they missed catching on what refund means. It does not mean gift. It means the government took too much of YOUR money, freely used it, and is forced to give some back. I can only wish we got refunds. Once again, after having all monies taken out that we thought would keep us about even (and zero dependents), we owe $$$$.

It's the same mentality we see the car salesmen hawking... Payment per month instead of looking at the total cost of a car. Actually, it's the whole credit card mentality. But again, that's a whole 'nother thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top