Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-23-2016, 01:34 PM
 
Location: New York
1,098 posts, read 1,246,148 times
Reputation: 1073

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mizzourah2006 View Post
That's some extreme depreciation. I'm coming up on 3 years for mine and it's depreciation from purchase price according to KBB trade in at very good is about 23%, 17% if you go private sale. So even if that's off by a factor of 10% that still is only 1/2 the depreciation you are factoring.

Every time I see these extreme depreciations I notice that most people tend to look at sticker price of new to trade in value. What percentage of people that buy cars actually pay sticker price? I've never paid anywhere near sticker for a car.

But I do agree that many people buy cars based on the payments they can afford instead of the overall price that they can afford.
Sorry...it was just an extreme example...lets say 30K into 18K in 4 years. Also it depends on the condition of the vehicle and possible fender benders recorded to insurance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-23-2016, 02:16 PM
 
Location: Shady Drifter
2,444 posts, read 2,763,578 times
Reputation: 4118
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
You are paying for depreciation regardless of whether you lease, finance, or pay cash.
I didn't say anything to the contrary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 07:14 PM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,581,120 times
Reputation: 16230
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeagleEagleDFW View Post
I didn't say anything to the contrary.
You said this:

Quote:
Most people don't have a large chunk of cash either (i) sitting around to spend on a car, or (ii) that they want to sink into a depreciating asset.
In other words, you are trying to use depreciation as a reason not to pay cash. I am simply pointing out that that makes no sense because you have the same depreciation whether you pay cash or not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 09:54 PM
 
Location: Shady Drifter
2,444 posts, read 2,763,578 times
Reputation: 4118
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncole1 View Post
You said this:



In other words, you are trying to use depreciation as a reason not to pay cash. I am simply pointing out that that makes no sense because you have the same depreciation whether you pay cash or not.

That's still not saying anything to the contrary, and that's really not the point I was trying to make. Depreciation is irrelevant to the point that using credit to purchase a vehicle isn't by default a bad decision.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 11:59 PM
 
9,408 posts, read 11,929,707 times
Reputation: 12440
I've never understood why people are so eager to blow so much of their hard-earned money on a car, of all things. A vehicle! A depreciating liability that eats even more money in the form of gas, maintenance, insurance, etc .It gets you from point to to point b. It serves no real purpose beyond that and yet throngs of people are pushing themselves to the brink for the damn things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2016, 08:49 AM
 
5,342 posts, read 6,166,341 times
Reputation: 4719
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11thHour View Post
I've never understood why people are so eager to blow so much of their hard-earned money on a car, of all things. A vehicle! A depreciating liability that eats even more money in the form of gas, maintenance, insurance, etc .It gets you from point to to point b. It serves no real purpose beyond that and yet throngs of people are pushing themselves to the brink for the damn things.
I know, I don't understand why people are so eager to blow so much of their hard-earned money on fancy restaurants. It completely depreciates over night and food's only real purpose is to provide calories and nutrients to the human body, why pay more for it when you can just get it from the grocery store.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2016, 09:32 AM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,581,120 times
Reputation: 16230
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeagleEagleDFW View Post
That's still not saying anything to the contrary, and that's really not the point I was trying to make. Depreciation is irrelevant to the point that using credit to purchase a vehicle isn't by default a bad decision.
Ok, fair.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2016, 09:33 AM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,581,120 times
Reputation: 16230
Quote:
Originally Posted by mizzourah2006 View Post
I know, I don't understand why people are so eager to blow so much of their hard-earned money on fancy restaurants. It completely depreciates over night and food's only real purpose is to provide calories and nutrients to the human body, why pay more for it when you can just get it from the grocery store.
I need to spread reputation around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2016, 10:09 PM
 
Location: Oregon, formerly Texas
10,065 posts, read 7,235,755 times
Reputation: 17146
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11thHour View Post
I've never understood why people are so eager to blow so much of their hard-earned money on a car, of all things. A vehicle! A depreciating liability that eats even more money in the form of gas, maintenance, insurance, etc .It gets you from point to to point b. It serves no real purpose beyond that and yet throngs of people are pushing themselves to the brink for the damn things.
Until the USA suddenly has a public transportation revolution, because they are necessary expenses. By my reckoning there are, at best, 10 cities in the USA where not having a car is possible - New York City, Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, Washington D.C., Seattle, San Francisco. Maybe a couple smaller ones like Portland, Charlotte or Salt Lake... but you'd have to live close the lines.

Generally speaking you can't get around without a car unless you live in a "walkable" place, which is usually prohibitively expensive.

So you need a car that's reliable... and cars are complex machines with gas-powered engines that require maintenance and break down. If you go older and cheaper, it WILL be in the shop from time to time. I own a 1988 Chevy and a 1999 Pontiac. I should know. We also spend so much time commuting that a car is a lifestyle investment & "likability" of your car should be taken into account.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2016, 02:13 PM
 
1,960 posts, read 4,663,072 times
Reputation: 5416
Yep, no public transport of consequence. Which kinda kills the argument of cheap cost of continental living, if a car chunks up that much of your household budget.

Of course we know that's hyperbole. There are options other than 40K SUVs and sedans. If we all drove 15K econoboxes, the aggregate cost of transportation in a Country without public mass transport wouldn't be an issue. BUT!....Americans are 50K/yr millionaires. They have to be. Why? Because they know they're paycheck-to-paycheck slaves, they know they have no cash, they know they have no income or job security. Why be a miser when you know you're already screwed? I'm not being flippant, this is exactly how my exwife behaved and why she divorced me as a non-compliant spousal unit within that expectation of consumption behavior.

Financing allows them to feel as though they are secure and affluent, even when they know they're going to a social security de facto indigent "retirement". That's really the jist of it. And it all stems from our economic policies and our hatred for labor as a social class; the masses simply accept it as a sunk cost of not having political power or literacy.

So you make a car, a house and a cellphone plan affordable enough to finance for the length of your natural life, and the frog will happily boil. I call it "have a good day slavery". None of these interest-related financial opportunity cost discussions is ever part of the perma-payment car loaner masses. You guys are outliers and your perspective as a demographic is irrelevant, by virtue of being here and posting with any modicum of displayed "financial choice/freedom" or literacy in the first place.

My only dog in the fight is the same as that for the cost of healthcare. If the unadjusted bill didn't come to half a million dollars for a 2 week stay at the clinic, I wouldn't need insurance to negotiate down in the first place. Ergo, if the meh cheapo 4-banger mass produced clone of every other car didn't cost 25K after fees taxes and title, such as the ho hum no-towing capacity Mazda 4-banger CX-5 I begrudgingly purchased last year, which I can't tell apart in a parking lot from a Kia or Acura or Ford, when I couldn't find a direct replacement for my 2000 Jeep cherokee at the same inflation adjusted price, then you wouldn't need car payments in the first place. Why do you think there's an uptick in sales of loading up cheap cars with options versus paying the same for a lesser loaded higher performing vehicle? Because cars are escapism in a society that cannot afford discretion after the house payment is done with. The vacuum cleaner that takes you to and from work is then forced to provide you with non-economic contentment in addition to transportation utility. Especially as your second highest household line item month to month for life. Sad, considering most people are NOT car hobbyists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:00 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top