Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Why is the US losing jobs? Is it:
Immigration? 24 19.67%
Jobs leaving the US? 62 50.82%
High wages? 14 11.48%
Technology? 57 46.72%
Company mergers? 21 17.21%
Other reasons? (write-in) 25 20.49%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 122. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-22-2017, 07:41 AM
 
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
2,940 posts, read 1,811,259 times
Reputation: 1940

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pub-911 View Post
Money is actually just a medium of exchange. What actually does have value is what we give up in order to acquire money, and what we acquire by then giving up money.
Yes, but this assumes a capitalistic society in where the value of some good is determined by the free market. Again, back out from this thought process and think about the overall economic system. Then see how it applies to this job situation we currently have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-22-2017, 07:55 AM
 
4,224 posts, read 3,014,352 times
Reputation: 3812
Huh? It doesn't assume anything at all except that there are producers, consumers, and money that can be used to connect the two. There is value in the real inputs and real outputs of an economy, but money in this scenario is only a means for convenient exchange.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2017, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
2,940 posts, read 1,811,259 times
Reputation: 1940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pub-911 View Post
Huh? It doesn't assume anything at all except that there are producers, consumers, and money that can be used to connect the two.
My point was, creation of value is due to a capitalistic economic system. Without it, everything is worthless and money would be unnecessary. A capitalistic system is what determines various values of different things depending on the supply/demand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2017, 08:07 AM
 
4,224 posts, read 3,014,352 times
Reputation: 3812
Quote:
Originally Posted by man4857 View Post
My point was, creation of value is due to a capitalistic economic system. Without it, everything is worthless and money would be unnecessary. A capitalistic system is what determines various values of different things depending on the supply/demand.
That makes no sense. Capitalism is both rare and more of an impediment than an avenue to economic well-being. Markets meanwhile provide important signals at low cost in every sort of economy. They are totally amoral however, and need constant monitoring and oversight in order to function as a social good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2017, 08:17 AM
 
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
2,940 posts, read 1,811,259 times
Reputation: 1940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pub-911 View Post
That makes no sense. Capitalism is both rare and more of an impediment than an avenue to economic well-being. Markets meanwhile provide important signals at low cost in every sort of economy. They are totally amoral however, and need constant monitoring and oversight in order to function as a social good.
How can it not make sense?

The value of any good is determined by supply and demand. The reason there's such a thing is because there is a need to profit through a capitalistic system and the method of which this is done is through the "market" (i.e. it creates a supply/demand curve and prices goods accordingly or essentially places a value on things). Through capitalism, goods that can make a profit are produced and those that can't aren't (or they eventually die out/go out of business). Producers exists cause they can profit off of their products that consumers want.

Your sentence in bold doesn't make any sense. A "market" is where the supply and demand curve meets, where seller is willing to sell to a buyer at x price for some good.

Your last sentence is correct to describe capitalism. The nature of the system is amoral and does not care about humanity or the welfare of society as a whole and in order for capitalism to function, it needs to be controlled by the government through policy and regulation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2017, 09:29 AM
 
4,224 posts, read 3,014,352 times
Reputation: 3812
Again. markets are not even a relative of capitalism. Markets exist is every sort of economic system. The most well-regulated ones are often found in what has been called "managed capitalism" or sometimes "socialism" by reactionaries.

The short-form definition of "capitalism" meanwhile is simply "the worship of capital." It's good that you recognize the pernicious nature of the beast. Many do not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2017, 08:30 AM
 
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
2,940 posts, read 1,811,259 times
Reputation: 1940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pub-911 View Post
Again. markets are not even a relative of capitalism. Markets exist is every sort of economic system. The most well-regulated ones are often found in what has been called "managed capitalism" or sometimes "socialism" by reactionaries.

The short-form definition of "capitalism" meanwhile is simply "the worship of capital." It's good that you recognize the pernicious nature of the beast. Many do not.
Yes you're right about in general markets are not specific to capitalism, however, the context I was going for was in terms of the US since this thread is about jobs being lost domestically.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2017, 09:39 AM
 
4,224 posts, read 3,014,352 times
Reputation: 3812
Whatever the context you were going for, your statements concerning markets and capitalism contained serious flaws. Some aspects of capitalist economic theory still do make sense, but the religion of capitalism should be shunned in its entirety.

By the way, 5,252,000 Americans began a new job in December. 283,000 of those were in manufacturing.

Last edited by toosie; 02-24-2017 at 04:57 PM.. Reason: You still make your point without trolling the right wing
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2017, 10:39 AM
 
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
2,940 posts, read 1,811,259 times
Reputation: 1940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pub-911 View Post
Whatever the context you were going for, your statements concerning markets and capitalism contained serious flaws. Some aspects of capitalist economic theory still do make sense, but the religion of capitalism should be shunned in its entirety.

By the way, 5,252,000 Americans began a new job in December. 283,000 of those were in manufacturing.
I wasn't trying to suggest laissez faire capitalism but only pointing out the nature of capitalism and free market is forcing all these job losses and automation we are witnessing today. It needs to be regulated heavily by the government. But I think shunning capitalism would be incorrect to say as we still operate on it's principles, it's just that it's controlled and regulated by government.

Last edited by toosie; 02-24-2017 at 04:58 PM.. Reason: Edited quoted post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2017, 11:57 AM
 
164 posts, read 138,038 times
Reputation: 272
Quote:
Originally Posted by lieqiang View Post
And data on jobs by sector and weekly wages reflects this... oh wait it doesn't.

This particular claim is one of the most commonly thrown out that is never actually supported by any data. People have heard it, so they repeat it, but when it comes down to a source it is usually some vague reference to noticing that lots of stores are closed or some relative/friend with advanced degree that can't get a job better than retail.

The employment situation is solid.
MIT's analysis says otherwise, they even admit in the linked papers here that they low ball estimated the CoL significantly. The data shows that pretty much nowhere in the nation can you really make it on such low wages.
The Living Wage Map
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top