U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-14-2017, 09:12 AM
 
1,041 posts, read 566,241 times
Reputation: 302

Advertisements

Destination based cash flow tax:

This explanation published by the Christian Science Monitor, (a reputable newspaper), is inadequate. Can any of the forum’s members provide a link to a superior explanation of DBCFT?

Excerpted from
Here is the scoop on corporate tax reform proposals from House Republicans - CSMonitor.com

“(2) The DBCFT is essentially a value-added tax (VAT), but with a deduction for wages. Every advanced country except the U.S. has a VAT alongside a corporate income tax. The U.S. would in effect be replacing the corporate income tax with a modified VAT. A VAT taxes consumption, not income – it has the same effects as a national retail sales tax, but works better administratively”.

Double dipping? Enterprises operating within the USA deduct their normal domestic expenditures for labor costs (from what if corporate income taxes are repealed)?

How would the USA enforce a tax upon money paid to recipients beyond our borders? Isn’t that particularly difficult when the money is passed among globally operating single enterprises, or enterprises associated with each other such as subsidiary enterprises or otherwise independent enterprises that are associated by innumerable manners of other agreements?

What I’ve read thus far implies a proposal that’s only applicable to USA’s international transactions; I consider that to be less rather than more feasible than USA adopting a general value added tax, (i.e. VAT).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-14-2017, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Haiku
3,097 posts, read 2,182,285 times
Reputation: 4756
I have no idea how it would get enforced but this sounds like a means to accomplish what Trump wants to do which is to tax imports but not exports. I thought many Republicans were against starting a tariff-war?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2017, 11:23 AM
 
1,041 posts, read 566,241 times
Reputation: 302
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoByFour View Post
I have no idea how it would get enforced but this sounds like a means to accomplish what Trump wants to do which is to tax imports but not exports. I thought many Republicans were against starting a tariff-war?
TwoByFour, I’m among the proponents for USA adopting the unilateral policy described within Wikipedia’s “Import Certificates” article. Regardless of other nations’ reactions, it will remain to USA’s better economic and social net advantage.

Respectfully, Supposn
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top