Quote:
Originally Posted by rruff
Instead of the current fair market value, which is much more relevant to the services that are provided by the taxation.
So clever of you to use an example of an anomalous period where RE values dropped a lot!
But all *persons* who own property subject to taxation are not treated the same! The court allows all sorts of discrimination. That doesn't mean it's good or fair policy.
BTW Prop 13 was originally pushed by big money RE investors who wanted to reduce their taxes. The tactics and campaign worked wonderfully.
|
What part is so hard to understand that the highest court in the land has already ruled on this?
Wishing for something else does not make it so.
My anomalous example means more to me than blank statistics... the example is real because I live it every day... I have been there twice as long in a old home half the size and my neighbor pays significantly less...
What people fail to realize is these discussions only come up in appreciating markets... barely a word when prices drop... yet any look at California Real Estate with show significant drops...
How does a single person in a 2 million SF condo use more services than a family in a 200k mobile home?
Yet the single person in the 2 million condo pays 10x the property tax of the family with kids does in the 200k mobile home.
Yes... Prop 13 has been around for 40 years... and Sacramento Politicians had ample opportunity to address double digit property tax increases and something as simple as indexing the Home Owner Exemption for inflation was asking too much...
The "Miscalculation" is politicians thought they could drum up class warfare to stop Prop 13 cold... and at the 11th hour came up with their own ballot measure... just how dumb do they think people are?
As mentioned many times... I was too young to have voted for it... but give thanks each and every day for those that did.