Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-28-2017, 03:18 AM
 
4,765 posts, read 3,719,341 times
Reputation: 3038

Advertisements

Sure it is possible, just look at Iran and North Korea!

But possible doesn't mean desirable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-28-2017, 03:25 AM
 
1,957 posts, read 1,291,733 times
Reputation: 581
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuptag View Post
Would it be possible for the USA to be self-sufficient or become self-sufficient in the next 5-10 years for the following 30-50 years in all major aspects: food, fuel, medicine, metals, manufacturing.

Seems that the USA could: plenty of agricultural land and fishing grounds; plenty of petroleum, plenty of land of solar, wind power, coastline for wave power; best medical research and medicine production. Missing low value-added manufacturing, but it seems we could revive that in 5-10 years, plenty of iron ore and incentive to recycle.

I think there are few countries that are blessed to have enough skilled people, large enough population, and enough natural resources.
Yuptag, I’m among the proponents of the global trade policy described within Wikipedia’s “Import Certificates” article. It excludes the values of mineral materials integral to globally traded goods that are deemed by the congress to be scarce or precious minerals, from the assessed values of goods; (i.e. the policy does not affect prices or global trade due to the values of such scarce or precious materials within shipments).

Excluding the values of such materials, the policy prevents the values of USA’s annual imports from exceeding our exports and its entire costs are passed on to USA purchasers of imported goods. The unilateral trade policy is substantially (but not entirely) market driven.

To the extent that price increases exceed fees to defray costs of federal assessing and administrative tasks, those price increases (at no additional cost to anyone else), serve as price subsidies for USA’s exported goods.

Markets continue to determine what goods USA imports or exports.

Refer to Wikipedia’s “Import Certificates” article.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2017, 08:12 AM
 
18,792 posts, read 8,409,237 times
Reputation: 4125
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlmostSeniorinNJ View Post
Maybe they could, but they could never produce enough to provide for the entire country. Coffee would cost $30 a pound.
I did mention inflation if we stopped imports. No doubt. Right now I get my Keurigs for about 60 cents. If they were $2 my life would not change.

My mother who lived through The Depression used to save her 'teaball' (New Yorker) and use it the next day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2017, 08:50 AM
 
4,224 posts, read 2,995,496 times
Reputation: 3812
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlmostSeniorinNJ View Post
Maybe they could, but they could never produce enough to provide for the entire country. Coffee would cost $30 a pound.
Kona already costs that much and more, and Puerto Rico exports very little coffee while importing about two-thirds of what the island itself consumes.

By the way, pineapple production in Hawaii today is not at all what it once was. If not for a growing market for actual fresh pineapples, the culture might well have disappeared from the islands entirely.

Last edited by Pub-911; 07-28-2017 at 09:41 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2017, 08:52 AM
 
1,957 posts, read 1,291,733 times
Reputation: 581
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
I did mention inflation if we stopped imports. No doubt. Right now I get my Keurigs for about 60 cents. If they were $2 my life would not change.

My mother who lived through The Depression used to save her 'teaball' (New Yorker) and use it the next day.
Hoonose, USA’s chronic annual trade deficits drag upon our GDP and consequentially also drag upon our numbers of jobs. Annual trade deficits are always net (more than otherwise) detrimental to their nations’ economies.

Refer to the thread
http://www.city-data.com/forum/econo...-median-7.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2017, 09:20 AM
 
5,462 posts, read 3,017,805 times
Reputation: 3271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuptag View Post
Would it be possible for the USA to be self-sufficient or become self-sufficient in the next 5-10 years for the following 30-50 years in all major aspects: food, fuel, medicine, metals, manufacturing.

Seems that the USA could: plenty of agricultural land and fishing grounds; plenty of petroleum, plenty of land of solar, wind power, coastline for wave power; best medical research and medicine production. Missing low value-added manufacturing, but it seems we could revive that in 5-10 years, plenty of iron ore and incentive to recycle.

I think there are few countries that are blessed to have enough skilled people, large enough population, and enough natural resources.
For that people should become self sufficient. Self sufficiency is not encouraged in a consumer based capitalism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2017, 09:43 AM
 
4,224 posts, read 2,995,496 times
Reputation: 3812
Efforts to be "self-sufficient" are not encouraged by any sort of rational analysis at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2017, 02:12 PM
 
23,690 posts, read 9,305,200 times
Reputation: 8652
We can be energy independent for sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2017, 02:32 PM
 
20,955 posts, read 8,618,580 times
Reputation: 14050
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pub-911 View Post
Blow up your TV. Throw away your paper. Move to the country. Build you a home. Plant a little garden. Eat a lot of peaches. Try and find Jesus on your own.
If someone finds Jesus that will do away with the quest of millions of other trying to find him. If you do find him please book him for a Sermon on the Mount tour. I want to see him in a smaller venue.

The US could not even start to be self-sufficient. It was never...not since the day the first European set foot here. We have too much of some stuff and too little of others...

This is in addition to the basic facts - other countries (citizens and the countries themselves) own vast amounts of our country - mines, factories, real estate, etc.

So "our country" is not even ours.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2017, 02:38 PM
 
1,870 posts, read 2,212,277 times
Reputation: 3032
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaker281 View Post
Sure it is possible, just look at Iran and North Korea!

But possible doesn't mean desirable.
I wouldn't say North Korea nor Iran are self-sufficient. They have their own trading partners (Russia, China, Vietnam, etc) and also receive foreign aid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top