U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-22-2017, 09:39 AM
 
1,033 posts, read 561,875 times
Reputation: 300

Advertisements

Within the thread, "Replacing reduced FICA payroll tax rates with a federal general sales tax" I advocate reducing the FICA payroll tax revenue by 9% and replacing it with a 4.5% general sales tax to increase tax revenues for Social Security retirement and Medicare. Thereafter, FICA would no longer fund Medicare and FICA total rates funding Social Security retirement should never exceed twice the federal general sales taxís effective rate.

[quote=Supposn;49261779]LowExpectations, within post #8 I expressed some of my opinions regarding waivers of general sales taxes.

Iím an advocate of waiving sales taxes upon medicines, or food other than that supplied by restaurants, or caterers.
itís difficult to draft legislation the parses ordinary and luxury priced products. For that reason, Iím advocate of fewer such sales tax waivers upon classes of products. But the political reality is that there will be more than I prefer.

Iím aware to the extent that general sales taxes are waived upon sales of products that are more often or in greater quantities consumed by lower income persons, we can to some limited extent transform a sales tax to be effectively more progressive.
But itís difficult to draft regulatory provisions for such products as not to unduly reduce tax revenues.
Travel within reasonable commuting distances on mass transportation is one of the service products that I would prefer to be waived if the legal drafting did not also allow waivers for longer distances or more luxurious transportation.

Difficulty of legal drafting is much less problematic for products or services that can be linked to individualsí primary residences. Itís feasible to waive a capped amount upon rents, specific utilities, and other services linked to such residences; those capped amounts should be annually cost-of-living adjusted.[/QUOTE
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top