Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The survey also looked at homeownership, race and having a disability in relation to food security. Results showed that 4.9 percent of homeowners and 15.5 percent of renters were food insecure, meaning they had “low” or “very low” food security.
Nobody "gets" anything" from an employer. You work for it. You pay for it. You are what you make yourself to be.
You "get" Cheerios from the grocery store. Nothing wrong with his usage.
And many people do "get" health insurance from their employer, either via deduction or partial payment or outright compensation. I don't see any implication of socialist freeware whining demand up there, as you're sort of implying here.
The survey also looked at homeownership, race and having a disability in relation to food security. Results showed that 4.9 percent of homeowners and 15.5 percent of renters were food insecure, meaning they had “low” or “very low” food security.
The survey also looked at homeownership, race and having a disability in relation to food security. Results showed that 4.9 percent of homeowners and 15.5 percent of renters were food insecure, meaning they had “low” or “very low” food security.
"All people who are struggling economically don't earn enough, waste their money on foolish things and thus aren't worth further consideration."
Mods? You can shut down the Econ forums now. We're all done.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.