U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-14-2018, 11:32 AM
 
24,723 posts, read 26,794,844 times
Reputation: 22714

Advertisements

Finally, someone from the mainstream media gets it--at least to some degree.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/polit...145632855.html

Which would you prefer: Economic authoritarianism? Or domineering socialism?

This might sound like an Econ 101 thought experiment, but in reality, it’s the choice being offered American voters by the nation’s two major political parties. If you thought Republicans and Democrats mainly differed on the matter of how best to distribute the spoils of free-market capitalism, you’re stuck in the 1990s. Each of these parties is now lurching toward anti-capitalist statism, with the main difference being how, exactly, the government should control the economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-14-2018, 12:10 PM
 
961 posts, read 921,475 times
Reputation: 1194
History just does seem to repeat itself, huh? When enough people feel like the system is not working for them (or the majority) there's talk of revolution, a magna carta, a "new deal," etc. The truth is that we've never had one extreme form of an economic model or the other extreme; it always seems as though societies have adopted shades or elements of such theoretical economic models. In the US, we've had quite a run from the industrial revolution to the booming middle class (an invented people). However, the last 40 years has lost a lot of progress and the middle class has lost momentum. Many policies have been installed to try to prop it up, but many did not work or lost their effectiveness.

Meanwhile globalism and technology has served as a catalyst for competition and America is losing its edge. Think about how many how many emerging market countries were doing relative to the US just 15-30 years ago? Look no further than the UAE, South Korea, Vietnam, Eastern Europe, and...China. All of those economically fast moving countries either had huge injections from the IMF, had major corruption, or conveniently evolved their economic models over the course of their progress. What an interesting time to be a student in political science.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top