U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-01-2018, 02:37 AM
 
Location: Telecommutes from Northern AZ
1,032 posts, read 1,023,657 times
Reputation: 1394

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulsker 1856 View Post
Correct. In the midst of the great recession.

But never during economic growth such as that of the last quarter. And under the second term of the previous President, there were numerous quarters when growth equaled or exceeded that of 2Q18.

So comparing the two is baseless.
Not so much about economic growth as it is about the budget deficit, which hasn't improved much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-01-2018, 03:07 AM
 
Location: VB
365 posts, read 314,781 times
Reputation: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainNJ View Post
that depends on the job and who the contractors have paid off for the work.

most of the work doesnt even need to be done. i wonder why trump didnt include the military in this. do we really need so many military personnel?
Even if he wanted to, Trump couldn't really do much about it. The military pay raise of 2.6% for 2019 -- the largest in nine years -- is in the National Defense Authorization Act, which passed both houses of Congress with veto-proof majorities. Congress has the last say on civilian pay as well (through other spending bills), though they may just accept the President's plan of a 0% increase.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2018, 12:45 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
20,808 posts, read 37,487,214 times
Reputation: 20869
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMBGBlueCanary View Post
The problem is if the government doesn't have the employees to do the job, they hire contractors (who end up costing taxpayers more because they charge more). The more people vacate staff positions, the more we are going to rely on private contractors to get the work done.
this is so VERY true
the government doesn't have the employees to do the job, they hire contractors...rely on private contractors to get the work done

reduce the work load (Great idea!)
reduce the workforce (Great idea)

Just part of the 'master plan'... remember we are only 20 months into this bloodbath.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2018, 12:55 PM
 
7,012 posts, read 6,641,386 times
Reputation: 5289
Pretty much every large organization in the public and private sectors hires a lot of contractors. At MCI Worldcom, they had a rule-of-thumb of 3 consultants for every employee. The employee would retain the technical knowledge of the systems, and the contractors were automatically laid off in one or two waves each year to prevent managers from keeping people on without justification. Since the date of separation was known in advance, some contractors would jump ship in advance and work somewhere before they could be hired back. Some would be offered full-time employment in lieu of the layoff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2018, 12:58 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
2,765 posts, read 1,216,199 times
Reputation: 5091
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thatsright19 View Post
If a federal employee thinks they’re worth more, they’re free to test the market and go get it.
Oh, they'll get it. The new Federal jobs are leaner than one might imagine. Cut them too far and....well, there's lots of examples of what happens in countries when people with Federal powers start getting less of their compensation from their paycheck and more from other areas.

I like a smaller government scope, but those workers should be paid, unless you truly want to put the full letter of the law in some flunky accountant's hands at the IRS to decide your fate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2018, 01:45 PM
 
Location: Central IL
13,388 posts, read 7,140,948 times
Reputation: 31128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electrician4you View Post
You do know he donates his paycheck away..........


https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ake-no-salary/
...it's the least he can do considering how much more he's getting from the added business to all of his estabalishments based on Secret Service alone! And all he's saving from his family getting free airfaire in half a dozen different directions each weekend. He'd coming out well ahead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2018, 07:26 PM
 
4,116 posts, read 3,455,418 times
Reputation: 8207
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitpausebutton2 View Post
Link?

But still 1200 a year is not a tax cut.. its a insult to the working class. pff 1200.. should add extra zero to make a small dent on most working families.

https://www.fool.com/taxes/2018/01/2...e-in-2018.aspx
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2018, 12:46 AM
 
178 posts, read 43,826 times
Reputation: 523
I'm a public servant and I'm all for basing one's salary upon competence. I want the public sector to start demanding more from their public servants so maybe I wouldn't have to work with such losers and gravy-train riders. Nepotism is rampant (Indians only hire Indians, Asians only hire Asians, Libs only hire libs or other extremists, etc..) Corruption, nepotism and incompetence is worst than I ever imagined it to be. Taxpayers deserve so much more.

Yet these losers will end up promoting each other up the ladder until they are all set for life taking high-dollar pensions on the taxpayer dime while contributing little to nothing to the greater good.

Because of the corruption, there is NO OVERSIGHT of our state government, and we need someone who has the courage question the status quo because we're being used. Liberal governors consider state workers to be a whole big pool of likely liberal voters.

So I support President Trump. He's more in touch than people realize. I truly believe we need to cut the dead weight and start expecting more of those living on our tax dollars.

MAGA.

Last edited by settled00; 09-02-2018 at 12:59 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2018, 01:29 AM
 
Location: England
3,242 posts, read 3,021,861 times
Reputation: 3182
Quote:
Originally Posted by leastprime View Post
no Businessman would willing want to do business with DJT.
Nor would any US bank, obviously because of Trump's very poor business acumen, ergo no less than six corporate bankruptcies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2018, 03:21 AM
 
Location: Myrtle Creek, Oregon
11,068 posts, read 11,469,953 times
Reputation: 17222
The word is Trump is backpedaling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top