Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
When people call me names the action is childish, and I don’t know why you consider calling someone right wing is an attack, it’s not, it’s an observation.
To your second point, this is wrong. I’ve spent 50 pages individually answering questions, but for the last few pages, after all the retorts had been explained away, people like Kaz got mad and decided to attack me instead.
Those are the facts.
I stand by my comments. Please learn the difference between facts and opinions.
But of course you don’t feel you are attacking people when you refer to them as childish, right wing etc.
Many people have responded to your posts, but you just don’t like the answer. People have more recently ignored you because all you are doing is repeating comments (which they already addressed).
The bottom line, once again, is that people don’t agree with you. Learn to deal with it and move on.
That would be akin to rational thought, and experience has shown, that is not to be expected from this poster.
When I gave Kaz a proper answer, he mocked me and left. That is reflective of an inability to engage and analyze
Now you're confusing people unwilling to sit here in some war of attrition recycling the same arguments where everything you say is debunked then you just quote your own already refuted logic over and over.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324
But of course you’ll never respond logically, you won’t read any of my explanation from the past 50 pages, instead you’ll resort to insults as that is all you have left.
This thread reminds me of like a Red Sox fan trying to convince the fans in Yankee stadium that the Red Sox World Series win was a good thing and they should be happy for them.
Truly, this was the most useless economic discussion I’ve ever seen.
By citing Noam Chomsky as some sort of economics or corporate authority, you have demonstrated that your ideas have less credibility than I even thought possible.
Was Winterfell really thinking that those who disagree will stop what they are doing, spend 15 minutes watching some youtube video, then somehow come to their senses with a 180 degree change in viewpoint? Posting youtube videos as evidence or counter-argument is usually the realm of the conspiracy theory types and SovCits, which granted tend to have a fairly large crossover.
By citing Noam Chomsky as some sort of economics or corporate authority, you have demonstrated that your ideas have less credibility than I even thought possible.
By citing Noam Chomsky as some sort of economics or corporate authority, you have demonstrated that your ideas have less credibility than I even thought possible.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
