Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-04-2008, 12:22 PM
 
Location: America
6,993 posts, read 17,364,475 times
Reputation: 2093

Advertisements

^^

I don't know much about Texas, what are your thoughts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-04-2008, 12:23 PM
 
Location: WA
5,641 posts, read 24,953,484 times
Reputation: 6574
Unemployment has reached 5.1%. Although worse than it was I believe that is the average for the last 16 years. The negative spin and prediction of a recession is overplayed in the press.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2008, 12:28 PM
 
Location: America
6,993 posts, read 17,364,475 times
Reputation: 2093
what does the average have to do with anything? We saw recessions in 2001 with a recovery that took two to three years and then another recession before that in the 90s and another one in the 80s. With recessions becoming the norm over the last decade of course the average would be that high.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2008, 01:00 PM
 
Location: WA
5,641 posts, read 24,953,484 times
Reputation: 6574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Style View Post
what does the average have to do with anything? We saw recessions in 2001 with a recovery that took two to three years and then another recession before that in the 90s and another one in the 80s. With recessions becoming the norm over the last decade of course the average would be that high.
You have to compare to something to know what is the expected norm...

Year Rate
1920 5.2 %
1928 4.2
1930 8.7
1932 23.6
1934 21.7
1936 16.9
1938 19.0
1940 14.6
1942 4.7%
1944 1.2
1946 3.9
1948 3.8
1950 5.3
1952 3.0
1954 5.5
1956 4.1
1958 6.8%
1960 5.5
1962 5.5
1964 5.2
1966 3.8
1968 3.6
1970 4.9
1972 5.6
1974 5.6%
1976 7.7
1978 6.1
1980 7.1
1982 9.7
1984 7.5
1986 7.0
1987 6.2
1988 5.5
1989 5.3
1990 5.6%
1991 6.8
1992 7.5
1993 6.9
1994 6.1
1995 5.6
1996 5.4
1997 4.9
1998 4.5
1999 4.2
2000 4.0
2001 4.7
2002 5.8
2003 6.0%
2004 5.5
2005 5.1
2006
Jan.2 4.7
Feb. 4.8
March 4.7
April 4.7
May 4.6
June 4.6
July 4.8
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2008, 01:09 PM
 
Location: Florida
2,336 posts, read 7,029,387 times
Reputation: 2304
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Style View Post
^^

how does that tie in to the over all economy?
It means that if you're unemployed and living somewhere like Michigan where you know the economy sucks and isn't going to get any better, quit whining and bitching and get your a-- down to Texas. They're hiring!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2008, 01:26 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pimpy View Post
It means that if you're unemployed and living somewhere like Michigan where you know the economy sucks and isn't going to get any better, quit whining and bitching and get your a-- down to Texas. They're hiring!
LOL yeah ! We've had tons of California transplants move into the big Texas cities over the past year driving our home prices up since it's so cheap here compared to California.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2008, 01:55 PM
 
Location: America
6,993 posts, read 17,364,475 times
Reputation: 2093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pimpy View Post
It means that if you're unemployed and living somewhere like Michigan where you know the economy sucks and isn't going to get any better, quit whining and bitching and get your a-- down to Texas. They're hiring!
rofl true, true. But if they are doing that bad, they may not have the ability to pick up and move.

cdelena

thank you for the info!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2008, 12:24 PM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,545,794 times
Reputation: 4949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Style View Post
^^

I don't know much about Texas, what are your thoughts?
Texas will keep doing ok while energy prices stay up. When the recession spreads out wide enough to drop consumption, and energy prices fall, Texas will sink, too.

But since things in the real world have "overshoots" it will not turn down hard until a little while after the energy prices start to drop, and that will create a very hard fall when it catches up here (Texas). Played this game before.

As far as all the unemployments beat and re-beat in this thread. That has become as much or more a political tool as the various inflation indexes. Since those numbers are massaged, the real meaning has become questionable. Best standards are still want ads and pay rates. Good numbers on those and you things are good. Not so good numbers and they are not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2008, 05:41 PM
 
12,022 posts, read 11,571,141 times
Reputation: 11136
The headline BLS figure excludes workers who are currently not looking for work because they've given up temporarily. The U-5 unemployment rate of 5.9 percent is probably more comparable to historical figures.

Table A-12. Alternative measures of labor underutilization
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2008, 06:17 PM
 
Location: Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania USA
2,308 posts, read 2,587,068 times
Reputation: 369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pimpy View Post
It means that if you're unemployed and living somewhere like Michigan where you know the economy sucks and isn't going to get any better, quit whining and bitching and get your a-- down to Texas. They're hiring!
IMO, you're taking a rather simplistic view of the mobility of the labor pool. The majority of employees can't simply uproot their family to move from a labor surplus market to a labor shortage market. The imbalances of available labor are often skill specific and are narrowly segmented. A person with skills "A, B and C" is not going to fit into a labor market that is requiring skills "D,E and F".

In my 12 years as an owner-operator for United Van Lines Household Goods Division, I moved many single persons and families from and to all points in the US and parts of Canada that were specifically for employment purposes. Some followed through successfully, many did not. The worst case that I recall was a young couple with several children and a pregnant wife that I moved from the East Coast to Arizona, the company went bankrupt 4 months after the family arrived in Arizona and had purchased a new home. The whole situation was so sad that I privately moved the family back to the East Coast on my trailer at no expense with the exception of fuel and labor. The story had a happy ending as the husband found a terrific job in Connecticut.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top