Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Currently, there are less than 2 taxpayers for every recipient of public entitlements.
When that drops to less than 1 taxpayer for every recipient, "something" will break.
Either a taxpayer revolt or a recipient riot.
Your data is really wrong - there are currently 2.7 workers for each recipient according to data from ssa.gov, projected to drop to 2.3 workers per recipient by 2035. The current projections shows it dropping to 2.1 workers per recipient in 2095, when a person born today would be 73. It never shows projections below 2 taxpayers per recipient over the next 70+ years, let alone below 1.
Once I was watching Susie Orman show and she asked her assistant who makE $80k year then,how much cc debt did he have?
He said $80K.
It is not unusual to have 30-40K cc debt
Define "not unusual" - the average CC debt is about $6K ($6194 in 2019) - carrying $80K (or even $30-40K) in CC debt is very rare according to the data.
Actually, it is very unusual. The median household credit card debt is less than $3k. The average is about double that. Most debt in the US is secured debt like mortgages & car loans and student loans for younger people.
Your data is really wrong - there are currently 2.7 workers for each recipient according to data from ssa.gov, projected to drop to 2.3 workers per recipient by 2035. The current projections shows it dropping to 2.1 workers per recipient in 2095, when a person born today would be 73. It never shows projections below 2 taxpayers per recipient over the next 70+ years, let alone below 1.
It depends on how you define “recipient of public entitlements”. There are ~ 40 million people who receive food stamps. The benefit for most is less than $150/month. 1 in 6 receive Social Security benefits. About 20% of those aren’t retirees.
It depends on how you define “recipient of public entitlements”. There are ~ 40 million people who receive food stamps. The benefit for most is less than $150/month. 1 in 6 receive Social Security benefits. About 20% of those aren’t retirees.
This is a discussion about Social Security, so the "recipient of public entitlements" that is being discussed is SS, that is not SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - current name for food stamps). There is the TANF program that is related and part of SS but only about 1M families are on that.
But just to put it in perspective, there are over 144 Million taxpayers in the US so that means that number supporting those on SNAP (42M) is even higher at a little over 3.4 per recipient - many retirees are supporting those on SNAP through taxes.
There are 18% that receive SS below retirement age - but most are disability retired or dependents of those that are retired so technically they are mostly retirees. I was one of those way back when I was in college - but it was hardly anything. My dad was disability/medically retired in his 50s.
Jetgraphics has repeated that nonsense before, last time he came up with 1.78
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics
Socialist InSecurity https://www.usdebtclock.org/
US Population : 332.4 million
US Income Taxpayers : 124.8 million
US Retired : 56.1 million
Medicare : 62.7 million
Medicaid : 83.7 million
Food stamp recipients : 40.8 million
It was pointed out to him that SSA themselves say there are currently 2.7 taxpayers per recipient, but apparently he'd make a great politician because he just waits awhile and spouts the same BS all over again without bothering to try to understand why his napkin math is wrong.
I think most people would be quite surprised to find out someone they know had that much CC debt, so it's probably unusual.
No *****. That is insane to have that much on a CC, unless you are wealthy enough to where you are routinely spend and pay off that entire balance each month. I don't know anyone like that personally.
Or an irrational individual who doesn’t understand what the program is for but is okay with that, wants it eliminated anyhow without a clue what impact that would cause. Your solution isn’t best or rational when you don’t even understand the subject
Right. Because the government did such a great job with social security that it went nearly bankrupt twice in its history and is projected to go bankrupt again in 10 years.
Give me a break. The best safety net against poverty is wealth. Help people build that. SS hinders that.
Jetgraphics has repeated that nonsense before, last time he came up with 1.78
It was pointed out to him that SSA themselves say there are currently 2.7 taxpayers per recipient, but apparently he'd make a great politician because he just waits awhile and spouts the same BS all over again without bothering to try to understand why his napkin math is wrong.
The government's projections on stuff like this area always optimistic.
Right. Because the government did such a great job with social security that it went nearly bankrupt twice in its history and is projected to go bankrupt again in 10 years.
Give me a break. The best safety net against poverty is wealth. Help people build that. SS hinders that.
Again the person who is clueless about what the program is, what it’s for or does is supposed to have all the answers to fix?
The greatest social safety net isn’t wealth, that’s entirely false as wealth gets pooled among few or wasted and then? That’s right the social safety net comes in a modern society
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.