Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-05-2021, 03:05 PM
 
Location: It's in the name!
7,083 posts, read 9,561,771 times
Reputation: 3780

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by flip33 View Post
I see your point. There are reasons why it should not be a moral issue.

Nevertheless, a large number of people believe that extreme wealth is immoral (trying to justify why they are not wealthy.)
I believe to a certain extent that extreme wealth is immoral. And there are different opinions on what extreme wealth is. But, when you look at most extremely wealthy individuals, you have to look at how they got their wealth. It's not like they got wealthy curing cancer, eradicating world hunger, or providing shelter for everyone on earth.

Let's look at Jeff Bezos. Extremely wealthy. How did he get there? We've read a number of articles talking about employees, white color and blue collar, being worked to death. Literally. People dying on the warehouse floor. Or, how about the countless municipal tax breaks? And that god awful display of greed during that HQ2 fiasco.

How about the Waltons? Wal-Mart destroyed small local businesses. People employed at Wal-Mart made so little, they still needed public assistance.

Oil families. Polluted and STILL pollute the air and water from their plants in the Deep South.

Some hedge fund managers. 2008 anyone? And to this day, they still gamble and manipulate the market. Extracting billions from not only the market but from taxpayers. To pay themselves 10 million dollar bonuses.

Lastly, for one or a few person to become so wealthy, the money has to be extracted from other people. Rich people aren't getting wealthy off of rich people.

To me, most of the extreme wealthy are in a sort of get it while you can mentality. They have so much wealth. But they don't stop. They just keep on accumulating it. Why? Their great great grandchildren couldn't even spend it all.

Just my opinion. I think there is a limit. I mean how many houses, cars, yachts, etc. does one person really need. I'll even give them jets, supercars, and three houses. But some has houses all over the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-05-2021, 04:02 PM
 
1,740 posts, read 1,265,028 times
Reputation: 1316
Valedictorian: Stay at home mom
2nd: Pastor
3rd: RE Agent sued for fraud
4th: Me

None of the top 3 (all friends of mine) are rich from what I know. Varying levels of success.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2021, 05:42 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas & San Diego
6,913 posts, read 3,370,512 times
Reputation: 8629
Quote:
Originally Posted by adelphi_sky View Post
I believe to a certain extent that extreme wealth is immoral. And there are different opinions on what extreme wealth is. But, when you look at most extremely wealthy individuals, you have to look at how they got their wealth. It's not like they got wealthy curing cancer, eradicating world hunger, or providing shelter for everyone on earth.

Let's look at Jeff Bezos. Extremely wealthy. How did he get there? We've read a number of articles talking about employees, white color and blue collar, being worked to death. Literally. People dying on the warehouse floor. Or, how about the countless municipal tax breaks? And that god awful display of greed during that HQ2 fiasco.

How about the Waltons? Wal-Mart destroyed small local businesses. People employed at Wal-Mart made so little, they still needed public assistance.

Oil families. Polluted and STILL pollute the air and water from their plants in the Deep South.

Some hedge fund managers. 2008 anyone? And to this day, they still gamble and manipulate the market. Extracting billions from not only the market but from taxpayers. To pay themselves 10 million dollar bonuses.

Lastly, for one or a few person to become so wealthy, the money has to be extracted from other people. Rich people aren't getting wealthy off of rich people.

To me, most of the extreme wealthy are in a sort of get it while you can mentality. They have so much wealth. But they don't stop. They just keep on accumulating it. Why? Their great great grandchildren couldn't even spend it all.

Just my opinion. I think there is a limit. I mean how many houses, cars, yachts, etc. does one person really need. I'll even give them jets, supercars, and three houses. But some has houses all over the world.
Wealth is not "extracted" from other people, people willingly spend their money where they want to, is most convenient or less expensive. People are dying on the warehouse floors all over the country, but somehow only at Amazon is it an issue. Just don't buy at Amazon or Walmart if that is your desire or belief but don't act like others are immoral for doing so - people get to make their own choices.

This really has little to do with the topic though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2021, 06:36 PM
 
Location: Oregon, formerly Texas
10,060 posts, read 7,229,638 times
Reputation: 17146
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeApelido View Post
Valedictorian: Stay at home mom
2nd: Pastor
3rd: RE Agent sued for fraud
4th: Me

None of the top 3 (all friends of mine) are rich from what I know. Varying levels of success.
I feel like there is a story there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2021, 09:25 PM
 
Location: SF/Mill Valley
8,658 posts, read 3,853,671 times
Reputation: 5946
Quote:
Originally Posted by arr430 View Post
Think back about the people you have known who you thought were really smart. Schoolmates, co-workers, casual acquaintances, etc. How many of those people became, or are becoming, rich? No cheating, by thinking of rich people first and then thinking they must have been smart.

I suspect several on my list might have gone to prison. One became an oil engineer, then cattle rancher. One became a small-town lawyer. One an evangelist preacher. One a well-known TV commentator,one who who lived on political appointments and drove an old car, the last two were both Rhodes Scholars.
It could certainly be argued the people you describe weren't 'really smart' after all i.e. it's based in re: nothing more than your opinion at the time, particularly relative to 'schoolmates' and 'casual acquaintenances'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2021, 09:46 PM
 
Location: On the "Left Coast", somewhere in "the Land of Fruits & Nuts"
8,852 posts, read 10,451,396 times
Reputation: 6670
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv4horses View Post
Money isn’t always the holy grail for smart people. Most want to be comfortable but to make a useful discovery or solve a unique problem or provide some benefit to the earth or its inhabitants. Money can help them to do this sometimes but often a lot of that funding is provided by those who share their quest.

On the other hand there are some rich people who aren’t particularly smart but they stay rich. Their parents and grandparents gave them money to have or invest successfully and as long as they aren’t too goofy they can hold on to that for a while, even growing it. Luck and good advice or instincts play a roll.

Then there are the opportunists. They are just smart enough to get rich by trickery or crime, bypassing conventional law, ethics, or morality. Gotta watch out for those rich guys.
That's a good point, not everyone, including the 'bright' folks, is necessarily interested in 'making money', at least beyond their needs and other 'goals' where it's often simply another 'tool'. And can think of a couple Mensa types I've known, both basically artists, but who late in life also decided to apply their creativity and analytical savvy to real estate and day trading. But they soon acquired other 'interests' instead, as soon as they reached comfortable retirement and their intended 'goal'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2021, 09:59 PM
 
Location: SF/Mill Valley
8,658 posts, read 3,853,671 times
Reputation: 5946
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdaelectro View Post
Many highly intelligent people, just have no interest in accumulating wealth.
If wealth makes one's life easier/more enjoyable (or even if they wish to donate most of it or retire early), why would someone who was intelligent enough to accumulate wealth - choose not to? :-)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2021, 06:30 AM
 
Location: On the "Left Coast", somewhere in "the Land of Fruits & Nuts"
8,852 posts, read 10,451,396 times
Reputation: 6670
△ Dunno that wealth is 'unimportant', though perhaps not everyone agrees that it's the only thang in life... let alone whether simply acquiring it is always the 'best', 'happiest', or most meaningful use of their particular lives and abilities?

From NorCal's own Alan Watts...

On Wealth and Happiness

Last edited by mateo45; 08-06-2021 at 06:48 AM.. Reason: fix link...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2021, 09:50 AM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,544 posts, read 28,630,498 times
Reputation: 25111
I have never known a smart person who did not want to become economically successful.

With the ability comes the desire and means to succeed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2021, 12:01 PM
 
5,907 posts, read 4,427,522 times
Reputation: 13442
I think it’s flawed to think of the people you grew up with as “smart” anyways. There could have been the smartest kid in your small school or classroom of 30 kids, but it’s all relative. It’s like a 15 year old who thinks they’re great at basketball because they’re “all conference” and can run everyone out of the gym.

There’s people a hell of a lot smarter (and more athletic…creative *insert attribute here*) than you, you just haven’t met them yet. You will in college or the work world and you’ll see the treadmill of competition.


If I were to compare to the area I grew up in, my education, career, income, and net worth by this age are easily top 1% if not top .1%…but is that really the mark I want to be measured against?

“Rich” and “smart” is all relative.

If you’re the smartest person in the room, it’s time for a new room and all that….

Last edited by Thatsright19; 08-06-2021 at 01:00 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top