Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-30-2012, 07:51 AM
 
14,400 posts, read 14,303,039 times
Reputation: 45727

Advertisements

Forty plus years ago, educational standards tended to be higher than they are now. Standardized achievement tests have noted a gradual decline in the last twenty years in the performance of American students in English and Math skills.

If we go back in time, women were often constrained in their choice of occupations. It was rare to see a working woman who was not either a teacher or a nurse. As a result, education got the very most intelligent and best skilled women. Presumably, this translated into the country getting topnotch teachers at bargain wages.

I am not saying or suggesting that such a system was "just", "right", or desirable. I am simply articulating that was the reality than.

Than in 1964, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act which prohibited employers from discriminating against job applicants based on their race, sex, religion, or national origin. Many cultural changes occurred throughout the 1960's and 1970's which opened many doors for women into other occupations. Today, we find large numbers of women in every imaginable occupation including law, medicine, business, and engineering. There are many women owning and running their own businesses.

While this has been good for sexual equality, does anyone here believe it has had a negative effect on education in that the field can no longer attract "the best and brightest" teachers? Could we even conclude that this one factor is the major reason why educational achievement among our children has declined in the last 20-30 years? We aren't going to "roll the clock" back (and we shouldn't).

Am I right? Wrong? Or partly right?

Last edited by markg91359; 06-30-2012 at 08:12 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-30-2012, 08:01 AM
 
652 posts, read 1,052,750 times
Reputation: 666
I think it might have a grain of truth.

I think what we choose for curriculum has a huge impact as well though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2012, 12:14 PM
 
2,612 posts, read 5,585,694 times
Reputation: 3965
The premise that women who became nurses and teachers were "the best skilled and most intelligent" women would need support.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2012, 12:35 PM
 
13,496 posts, read 18,190,645 times
Reputation: 37885
I would suggest as each suceeding generation of youngster became more and more braindead, with a five-minute attention span, and parents who were only marginally better that teaching was seen as shoveling sh*t against the tide and the best people went elsewhere.

The secondary school teachers that I knew in the 90's were eagerly looking forward to getting out of teaching, and these were people who had taught for decades in what had once been an excellent public school.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2012, 12:48 PM
 
Location: Sioux Falls, SD area
4,861 posts, read 6,926,010 times
Reputation: 10175
Quote:
Originally Posted by markg91359 View Post
Forty plus years ago, educational standards tended to be higher than they are now. Standardized achievement tests have noted a gradual decline in the last twenty years in the performance of American students in English and Math skills.

If we go back in time, women were often constrained in their choice of occupations. It was rare to see a working woman who was not either a teacher or a nurse. As a result, education got the very most intelligent and best skilled women. Presumably, this translated into the country getting topnotch teachers at bargain wages.

I am not saying or suggesting that such a system was "just", "right", or desirable. I am simply articulating that was the reality than.

Than in 1964, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act which prohibited employers from discriminating against job applicants based on their race, sex, religion, or national origin. Many cultural changes occurred throughout the 1960's and 1970's which opened many doors for women into other occupations. Today, we find large numbers of women in every imaginable occupation including law, medicine, business, and engineering. There are many women owning and running their own businesses.

While this has been good for sexual equality, does anyone here believe it has had a negative effect on education in that the field can no longer attract "the best and brightest" teachers? Could we even conclude that this one factor is the major reason why educational achievement among our children has declined in the last 20-30 years? We aren't going to "roll the clock" back (and we shouldn't).

Am I right? Wrong? Or partly right?
For the most part, I agree with your analysis. I've said the same thing for years. My wife is the perfect example. She's a registered nurse who went into the profession because it, for the most part, was the highest achievable position in the medical field that was traditonally pursued. If she were just going to college now, she definitely would pursue being a medical doctor. When she graduated with her Bachelor's Degree she was #1 in the class, Summa *** Laude. She's a level of nurse academically that is seldom seen now since most young women with her abilities are becoming MD's, PT's, Anesthetists and other medical fields that require a doctorate.

The one part of your statement that I strongly disagree with is that this is THE major reason for the decline in education achievement. It is a factor, just not nearly with as much weight as you state. The MAJOR factor is the breakdown of the nucleous family with the accompanying disintegration of respect for authority and discipline. The biggest problems start at home and ends up affecting the classrooms. The failures of the family are perpetuated by not allowing the schools to clamp down on discipline. The teachers and administrators hands are tied lest these parental figures who have already failed on their end, complain that someone is trying to keep their little Johnny in line.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2012, 02:04 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,210 posts, read 107,883,295 times
Reputation: 116153
Quote:
Originally Posted by markg91359 View Post
Forty plus years ago, educational standards tended to be higher than they are now. Standardized achievement tests have noted a gradual decline in the last twenty years in the performance of American students in English and Math skills.

If we go back in time, women were often constrained in their choice of occupations. It was rare to see a working woman who was not either a teacher or a nurse. As a result, education got the very most intelligent and best skilled women. Presumably, this translated into the country getting topnotch teachers at bargain wages.

I am not saying or suggesting that such a system was "just", "right", or desirable. I am simply articulating that was the reality than.

Than in 1964, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act which prohibited employers from discriminating against job applicants based on their race, sex, religion, or national origin. Many cultural changes occurred throughout the 1960's and 1970's which opened many doors for women into other occupations. Today, we find large numbers of women in every imaginable occupation including law, medicine, business, and engineering. There are many women owning and running their own businesses.

While this has been good for sexual equality, does anyone here believe it has had a negative effect on education in that the field can no longer attract "the best and brightest" teachers? Could we even conclude that this one factor is the major reason why educational achievement among our children has declined in the last 20-30 years? We aren't going to "roll the clock" back (and we shouldn't).

Am I right? Wrong? Or partly right?
Sexual equality and non-discrimination weren't the causes of education going downhill. It was the informality introduced in the 1960's. Kids used to dress more formally for school. Then suddenly it was ok to come to school in jeans and T-shirt. Classroom discipline became more "flexible" at some point after that. Teaching methods changed. There was a movement toward alternative schools, and a variety of "alternative" teaching methods were experimented with, and some became mainstream. I'm sure that some of this varied from state to state, but the overall effect has been an erosion of educational standards.

And what about this odd anti-homework movement among parents today? How is that helping maintain educational standards?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2012, 04:58 PM
 
16,825 posts, read 17,730,892 times
Reputation: 20852
Quote:
Originally Posted by markg91359 View Post
Forty plus years ago, educational standards tended to be higher than they are now. Standardized achievement tests have noted a gradual decline in the last twenty years in the performance of American students in English and Math skills.
I have no idea where you get the above idea. Do you have any proof that STANDARDS are lower?

Everyone looks at our ranking in the world and then supposes that means that standards are lower. Kids are learning more than they did even when I was in high school just 20 years ago. My daughter had Calculus as a sophomore, all kids have to pass college prep classes as we have done away with tracking, math SAT scores continue to rise. The issue isnt the STANDARDS.


Quote:
If we go back in time, women were often constrained in their choice of occupations. It was rare to see a working woman who was not either a teacher or a nurse. As a result, education got the very most intelligent and best skilled women. Presumably, this translated into the country getting topnotch teachers at bargain wages.
You are ignoring the fact that the majority of women didn't work at all. Only 25% of married women in the 50s worked. And the majority of them did not work as teachers (many teachers were "let go" when they got married).

So now nearly 50% of the workforce is women. Therefore FAR MORE women are working then before. That number is going to completely overshadow and perceived artifact of loss of "intelligent" women to other careers.

And just as an aside, teachers have a median IQ of 104 and high school teachers have a median IQ of 110.

http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/Occupations.aspx

Therefore teachers are still above average in intelligence.

Finally, considering what we know now about how people learn compared to what was known in the 50s or 60s, teachers are trained with more skills regarding teaching strategies than previously.

Quote:
I am not saying or suggesting that such a system was "just", "right", or desirable. I am simply articulating that was the reality than.

Than in 1964, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act which prohibited employers from discriminating against job applicants based on their race, sex, religion, or national origin. Many cultural changes occurred throughout the 1960's and 1970's which opened many doors for women into other occupations. Today, we find large numbers of women in every imaginable occupation including law, medicine, business, and engineering. There are many women owning and running their own businesses.

While this has been good for sexual equality, does anyone here believe it has had a negative effect on education in that the field can no longer attract "the best and brightest" teachers? Could we even conclude that this one factor is the major reason why educational achievement among our children has declined in the last 20-30 years? We aren't going to "roll the clock" back (and we shouldn't).

Am I right? Wrong? Or partly right?
Partially right but for entirely the wrong reason. IF teacher quality is not what it could be, then it is much more likely due to the fact that teacher make less money than most correlating jobs with similar degrees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2012, 09:55 PM
 
18,069 posts, read 18,815,515 times
Reputation: 25191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
And what about this odd anti-homework movement among parents today? How is that helping maintain educational standards?
Because if it was just simple homework or studying, then fine, but it is not. Some classes and schools pile it on so much it deprives parents time with their own kid. There is a lot to learn outside the classroom, and I would like to spend time with my kids in the one life I have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2012, 12:35 AM
hsw
 
2,144 posts, read 7,162,376 times
Reputation: 1540
Easier today than ever before for any smart, ambitious 10yo kid to self-teach business English, math, stats, finance, comp sci, etc via khan academy, udacity, kindle, etc; get a GED; maybe attend Stanf CS for a yr before dropping out to join GOOG or some start-up as a highly-paid engineer....much like many kids can "attend" college for a yr or so before dropping out to join NBA/NFL....HS/colleges are merely archaic union cards for various socioeconomic gps seeking upward mobility

And ironically despite so many girls at college, etc, vast majority of top-earning engineers or traders in world's most Darwinian industries, software and hedge funds, are Jewish/white/Indian guys (not many Chinese/blks/Mexicans), most of whom would be considered socially inept (and targets of discrim/ridicule) by any good ole boy salesguy or industrial CEO or politician....speaks to market value of social skills and socially-mandated "diversity", or irrelevance thereof in modern tech era (and not many transgenders/girls in NBA/NFL/MLB either, right? Where are the Jews/Indians in NBA/NFL? What's pay in girl sports?)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2012, 07:01 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
753 posts, read 1,482,463 times
Reputation: 896
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevxu View Post
I would suggest as each suceeding generation of youngster became more and more braindead, with a five-minute attention span, and parents who were only marginally better that teaching was seen as shoveling sh*t against the tide and the best people went elsewhere.
Oh my God. Best quote ever about why teachers quit. A million reps for you!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top