U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-20-2014, 09:13 PM
 
Location: NoVA
6,572 posts, read 2,775,603 times
Reputation: 5759

Advertisements

Question from Pearson's FIRST grade math book, designed to be aligned with the core content.



How is this remotely developmentally appropriate? To answer it, a person must be capable of abstract reasoning, something a lot of middle school students can't even do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-20-2014, 09:17 PM
 
826 posts, read 455,648 times
Reputation: 970
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldhag1 View Post
Question from Pearson's FIRST grade math book, designed to be aligned with the core content.



How is this remotely developmentally appropriate? To answer it, a person must be capable of abstract reasoning, something a lot of middle school students can't even do.
Where is 8 + 6 = 14?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2014, 09:27 PM
 
Location: California
25,614 posts, read 17,133,267 times
Reputation: 18127
Is this one of those "grouping" math problems? Then D?

I don't know. I showed some of these kinds of things to my 23 year old and he figured them out and reminded me that nobody is seeing a question like that in a vacuum, and that they would obviously be taught this stuff a go over it in class, so it wouldn't be like me just seeing this with no context. And that thinking this way would come in handy when you get to higher level mathematics. I wouldn't know, I never got past beginning algebra.

My mind is old, his is younger and sharper, so I can't really say.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2014, 09:43 PM
 
Location: NoVA
6,572 posts, read 2,775,603 times
Reputation: 5759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
Is this one of those "grouping" math problems? Then D?

I don't know. I showed some of these kinds of things to my 23 year old and he figured them out and reminded me that nobody is seeing a question like that in a vacuum, and that they would obviously be taught this stuff a go over it in class, so it wouldn't be like me just seeing this with no context. And that thinking this way would come in handy when you get to higher level mathematics. I wouldn't know, I never got past beginning algebra.

My mind is old, his is younger and sharper, so I can't really say.
Yes, the answer is D. It requires the child mentally bump one number up to the nearest ten and reduce the other number by that same amount. It is a useful skill to be able to quickly estimate answers, especially when you start dealing with larger numbers. However, this is a question given to FIRST graders. First, as in 6 & 7 years old. It is not within the realm of how first graders think, which is concretely. It simply defies everything we understand about child development.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2014, 10:09 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
3,830 posts, read 5,722,282 times
Reputation: 4661
Oy vey. I fear we'll be seeing lots of this type of stuff. And when kids struggle with it, the reformers will pounce on public school teachers and push the privatization agenda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2014, 05:49 AM
 
Location: Space Coast
1,982 posts, read 2,613,099 times
Reputation: 2645
My daughter does the 8+6=14 in her head then chooses the choice that has 14 for an answer.
They're supposed to be 'adding by tens' or something like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2014, 06:08 AM
 
1,030 posts, read 471,692 times
Reputation: 2268
It just looks incorrect to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2014, 06:13 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
75,259 posts, read 36,424,032 times
Reputation: 18302
I guess those in charge don't believe in Piaget's stages of development anymore.
Looks like we're going to skip the concrete stage and go right to the abstract.

Just wait til those students get to adding fractions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2014, 06:27 AM
 
20,797 posts, read 32,810,594 times
Reputation: 9904
I don't see the issue IF the kids had been working concepts like that. To toss it out in a random assignment is a different story. Our kids did a lot of abstract thinking work in 1st grade, but they had examples in class so they knew the kinds of things to look for...which may or may not defeat the purpose .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2014, 07:14 AM
 
10,141 posts, read 11,536,385 times
Reputation: 9234
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldhag1 View Post
Question from Pearson's FIRST grade math book, designed to be aligned with the core content.



How is this remotely developmentally appropriate? To answer it, a person must be capable of abstract reasoning, something a lot of middle school students can't even do.
What is the right answer? I realize there are 14 toys in total, but none of the choices given seem to be the best way to represent the total number of toys. If you have 8 in the chest and 6 in the box I would say the correct mathematical expression is 8+6=14. However, the only choice that adds up to 14 is 10+4. How does that work?

I agree that this type of problem is developmentally inappropriate for 6 year olds. However, I don't even understand what the right answer is and I completed math through differential equations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $84,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top