Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-02-2010, 07:13 PM
JS1
 
1,896 posts, read 6,767,525 times
Reputation: 1622

Advertisements

The yearbook is fine, and it's not that big of a deal because these bigots are a vocal minority.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-04-2010, 05:57 PM
 
Location: Whoville....
25,386 posts, read 35,533,269 times
Reputation: 14692
Quote:
Originally Posted by John1960 View Post
"It's a disgraceful exploitation of our children. It was negligent to put pictures of minors in a yearbook making the statements they made."

Breitbart.tv » ‘Totally Inappropriate’: Gay Photos in Albuquerque HS Yearbook Anger Parents
I have to agree. IMO, any sexual content in a year book is inappropriate. I don't care if the kids making the statements are straight, gay or purple with green polkadots. It's not proper to put comments of a sexual nature made by minors in print for posterity.

Just wanted to add, while I know teenagers are sexual beings, I just don't think a yearbook is the proper place to display photos of PDA's or students comments on their sexuality. This is something that is meant to be read years and years from now and things that might embarass students later should be edited out.

Last edited by Ivorytickler; 05-04-2010 at 07:17 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2010, 07:29 PM
 
Location: Utah
293 posts, read 563,633 times
Reputation: 443
unless I'm missing something, I fail to see any sexual content from what was shown, and would not define students with arms around each other as such. PDA, well, it is what it is, and too much of it isnt a good thing, straight or otherwise. But again, I didnt find the yearbook to be exceptionally out of line based on what was shown.

These kind of things are a sign of the times, and unfortunately we'll always have reactions like these from people who arent ready for the times. However, it's a very encouraging message to those who might feel ashamed at their differences.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2010, 04:53 PM
 
540 posts, read 1,329,382 times
Reputation: 878
Talk about making a mountain out of a mole-hill. Bigots are exhausting
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2010, 05:55 PM
 
9,803 posts, read 16,187,823 times
Reputation: 8266
Perverts are exhausting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2010, 07:49 PM
 
Location: California
37,135 posts, read 42,203,740 times
Reputation: 35012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivorytickler View Post
I have to agree. IMO, any sexual content in a year book is inappropriate. I don't care if the kids making the statements are straight, gay or purple with green polkadots. It's not proper to put comments of a sexual nature made by minors in print for posterity.

Just wanted to add, while I know teenagers are sexual beings, I just don't think a yearbook is the proper place to display photos of PDA's or students comments on their sexuality. This is something that is meant to be read years and years from now and things that might embarass students later should be edited out.
YOU have not seen a HS yearbook in a while have you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2010, 08:42 PM
 
540 posts, read 1,329,382 times
Reputation: 878
Quote:
Originally Posted by marmac View Post
Perverts are exhausting.
No, perverts are criminals. Child pornographers, statutory rapists, peeping Toms, all need to be jailed, and rightly so.

So what does your comment have to do with this H.S. yearbook discussion? Do tell
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2010, 08:53 PM
 
10,624 posts, read 26,731,484 times
Reputation: 6776
I apparently also missed the "sexual content" of the photograph or caption. I don't think just having your arm around someone counts.

I suppose some people out there perhaps can't see a very innocuous photo of a couple (gay OR straight) without immediately thinking about sex or more "adult" topics, but that's their problem. School-sponsored dances and dating have always been a part of high school life (and if a school allows dances then that would seem just as much about "sexuality" as is a photo of two people sitting next to each other and commenting about how they "adore" another person); I highly doubt anyone will look back at their yearbook in later years and be embarrassed that they dated someone during high school.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2010, 02:49 PM
 
Location: Whoville....
25,386 posts, read 35,533,269 times
Reputation: 14692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
YOU have not seen a HS yearbook in a while have you?
Actually, not for a few years, but that doesn't change my opionion. This is a book intended for posterity. You should be very careful what you put in it .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2010, 02:53 PM
 
Location: Whoville....
25,386 posts, read 35,533,269 times
Reputation: 14692
Quote:
Originally Posted by uptown_urbanist View Post
I apparently also missed the "sexual content" of the photograph or caption. I don't think just having your arm around someone counts.

I suppose some people out there perhaps can't see a very innocuous photo of a couple (gay OR straight) without immediately thinking about sex or more "adult" topics, but that's their problem. School-sponsored dances and dating have always been a part of high school life (and if a school allows dances then that would seem just as much about "sexuality" as is a photo of two people sitting next to each other and commenting about how they "adore" another person); I highly doubt anyone will look back at their yearbook in later years and be embarrassed that they dated someone during high school.
School isn't about who you adore. Yearbooks commemorate (sp?, sorry in a hurry and can't look up the spelling) school NOT romantic relationships.

Given recent events, my daugher is quite humiliated over having liked a certain boy. Fortunately, there are no pictures in a year book of the two of them adoring each other. He turned out to be a wolf in sheeps clothing. We're looking into a restraining order. So, yes, someone can be embarassed later because of photos of them adoring the wrong person. Teenagers don't always make the best choices. This stuff doesn't need to be put in year books and preserved. That's not what yearbooks are for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top