Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So there’s agreement that student loans lead to bad financial circumstances for a large population… so what restrictions are they implementing, alongside the debt cancellation, to reduce the negative impact these loans have? After all, ‘forgiveness’ implies wrongdoing… so shouldn’t the focus also be on reducing the occurrence of wrongdoing in the first place?
Borrowing irresponsibly, with no skills or education to pay off your debt, and getting bailed out by taxpayers, usually leads to more of the same thing.
But this is about re-election, not ending student loan debt.
One thing people would learn in college, is when to use the word "average" and when to use the word "median."
I'll let you guess why that is.
100%. In this case, median is appropriate as the goal is to represent the impact of student loans on most of the students who have them.
Statistically, the usage of average would be good if you wanted to calculate risk if somehow loan amount was tied to blind probability. But that's not how loans work.
Well, you and your almighty Biden should come up with a better plan.
Says the guy claims "it will benefit me."
Page 1:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasLawyer2000
It does not help me directly, but the economic impact will likely benefit me.
Yes, the economic impact of bailing out deadbeats will not create more deadbeats at all..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.