Quote:
Originally Posted by ottertc
How many different ways do you have students discuss a topic in class? And, what different methods do you use to present new information?
|
Most classroom discussions fail because teachers prepare students inadequately and then expect them to take the conversational ball when they're completely uninvested in the topic. Then they wonder why discussion is like pulling teeth.
Here's what you do:
you prepare the ground first.
Let's say that a few days before we discuss
The Odyssey, I want my kids to discuss the following questions:
1. What constitutes a hero?
2. Do "hero requirements" vary from culture to culture?
3. Are there different requirements for a female hero?
4. Can a person be considered a hero if her or his motives for action -- though ultimately heroic -- were fundamentally selfish?
All right. I know if I say, "Okay, class, what constitutes a hero?" I'll be met with blank stares and silence and a few mumbles.
OTOH, what I do is this: a few days before we discuss, when I'm giving them background information and literary terms,
I'll tell them about five or six times (just casually in conversation) that we're going to be discussing the whole concept of heroism -- what a hero is, if the rules are different from culture to culture, et cetera. I'll just mention it and plant the seed and move on to define "epic" or go over Joseph Campbell's hero's journey idea, or whatever.
Then, when discussion day comes, I give the first question on the board and I ask students to
write down their primary ideas on a piece of paper -- just jot them down, make a list, whatever. I'll walk around to see if they're doing it and encourage people who are stuck.
When I've given them about 5-10 minutes for that, I have them
discuss the issue in small groups. I am not a groupwork person and generally I detest the immorality of groupwork, but this groupwork actually functions well. T(I should add that they're not
required to discuss in groups, but I allow them about 5-6 minutes to do so if they wish. They usually choose to do so.) Then, when they're done, I'll ask, "Okay, what are some initial ideas?"
I'll put the idea on the board. If it's the first or so time we're discussing, I usually let the first few ideas go without comment, partly b/c I'm still figuring out who's assertive and who's scared. If I'm dealing with an assertive student who won't shrivel like a snail at being asked a question, I'll generally say this or a variation: "Okay, Ms. Johnston, here's what I'm going to do: I'm going to disagree with you -- not because I necessarily don't agree with what you're saying, but because I want you to come back at me with a counter-argument. Don't just give up and say 'Oh, Mr. Wallace, you must be right because you're the teacher.' Give me a run for my money and tell me why you're still right and I'm wrong, wrong, wrong." The students get used to this schpiel after awhile and realize that
it's okay to disagree.
When they're more familiar with the process, I start asking
"why" and also questioning the extent to which they've thought through what they're saying. Here's an example:
Student: Well, okay, a hero is someone who risks his own life to save someone else.
Me: Why do you think so?
Student: They're willing to make a huge sacrifice to save others even if it means that they're going to die. That's heroic.
Me: So a firefighter would be heroic?
Student: Yeah.
Me: But what about the fact that firefighters are paid for the risks they choose to take? They're benefiting from others being in danger.
...and so on. I make a few things clear:
1. They will never know what I really think.
2. I will argue both sides of an issue.
3. I want them to develop what THEY think, not parrot what I think.
I then start
getting other students to add their own thoughts. I have a seating chart in which I keep track of who's spoken up. I might call on someone who hasn't spoken yet and say, "Mr. White, Mr. Jimenez is arguing that XYZ. Do you agree or disagree?"
At the end of the discussion, I have them summarize the major ideas we've come up with AND include in the summary at least one idea with which they disagreed AND one idea that surprised them or that they had not thought about before.
Hope this helps.