![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 370,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 13,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.| Search our forums (advanced): |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think you need to check again.. the land the roads run on is Indian land.. and is only on loan to New Mexico... for certain trade offs. But then again I maybe wrong about this.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Technically, Indian reservations are Federal Land in trust to Native Americans. Federal Law is supreme to Indian Law. Indian Law is above State law (I am not sure about this). So I would assume that the Interstates are regulated and controlled by the Federal Government and therefore the Natives would have no control over any of this. Thats how I think it is. Not sure though. ![]() Here is all I could find that shed light on the matter: Commerce Clause: Commerce Clause - Power To Regulate, Acts Constituting Commerce, Agencies And Instrumentalities Of Commerce, Business Affecting Commerce Check out this too: Native American Rights - Federal Power Over Native American Rights Last edited by abqsunport; 11-24-2007 at 02:50 AM. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I found a web site.. and it ha lots of legal language.. im not a lawyer, so its a tad confusing for me.. but here is one part I found in it.. see if you understand it any better than I.
Quote:
I also found this.. September 1998: A federal court cited a treaty between the Sandia Pueblo and the King of Spain to restore thousands of acres of land surrounding the city of Albuquerque (including land under the governor's house). More Legal language.. this is pretty good info though. Explains a lot. Attorney General June 1, 1995 Memorandum on Indian Sovereignty And even more Legal language.. =) Indian Tribal Sovereignty: It's Alive I think this explains that Indian Lands are not part of the US, but are independent Nations unto them selves. Last edited by Muhnay; 11-24-2007 at 04:16 AM. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I doubt that Sandia and Isleta
Pueblos would ever try to close the interstate as its a federal built Highway and also their are no Pueblo lands on I-40 east by the mountain so that would never be effected by this but more importantly with them both spending hundreds of millions to build these brand new Casinos and the ajoining Hotels next to them that would be suicide to their economies and finances. I heard that the Inn Of The Mountain Gids is in the red big time as they spent ....200 million ?? on their new Resort and the tourism for them has not owned up to what they thought it would be so they are more or less begging tourists to go there and spend their monies. Before Casinos and Hotels on their Reservations maybe.they would/could play that game....but now with those resorts on their Rez .....not a chance. They also employ thousands of thier own tribal members so there would be layoffs and the members would revolt and throw the leaders out of office as they are elected just like our own elections. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I remember a few years ago the Pojaque Reservation (not sure on spelling ) Had a problem with the gaming pacts beetween the state & Indian casinos. The governor of pojaque threatened to close the HWY north of Santa Fe. However they resolved their problem proir to it actually happening, the State actually got what they wanted...so I think there may have been some friendly persuasion by the Feds. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I feel bad for the Ysleta pueblo (cousins to the Isleta's) as the state of Texas shut them down. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Right, I think that they do have control in their Sovereign Nation over some state law, but not over Federal Law. That is how I think it is.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
VERSUS Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() I don't see the point you are trying to make. ![]() |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
The thread is about the two cities.. I was posting data on both of them.
there was also debate about the size of the two areas.. and the stats above prove there are far more people in the El Paso/Juarez metro. Where we have you beat on City populations, you have beat on metros if we don't include Juarez.. but I don't know how we cant include them they are a major factor of El Paso. Both seem to be on a path of increases, both in population, and in business. But I will say ABQ. does have a better track record on pay rates than El Paso does. |
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It's free and quick. Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|