Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sarah Palin-Chris Christie
Sarah Palin-Bob McDonnell
Sarah Palin- John Thune
Sarah Palin-Richard Burr
The best ticket is the one with Chris Christie as the Presidential candidate and a VP candidate whose pros outweigh their cons. The data suggest that Palin's positive>negatives. Remember, the people who said they 'considered' McCain until he chose Palin were full of s*** anyway and were Obama drones from the start.
If Christie is the Presidential candidate, he will have the same 3 words for Obama that Ivan Drago had for Apollo Creed in Rocky IV: 'You will lose.'
The best ticket is the one with Chris Christie as the Presidential candidate and a VP candidate whose pros outweigh their cons. The data suggest that Palin's positive>negatives. Remember, the people who said they 'considered' McCain until he chose Palin were full of s*** anyway and were Obama drones from the start.
If Christie is the Presidential candidate, he will have the same 3 words for Obama that Ivan Drago had for Apollo Creed in Rocky IV: 'You will lose.'
I'd still like to see a link that shows that the data suggest Sarah's positives are > her negatives.
It was anecdotal; I think Dick Morris said it. It wasn't that her + > - so much as he though her overall contribution to the McC campaign was net +.
How about hard evidence of any positive results under Obama? Job creation? Nope! Lower deficits? Nope! Lower debt? Nope! Lower Health Insurance premiums? Nope! A rising dollar? Nope!
The stock market has risen, but that doesn't look like it will last and it was coming off of major lows and inflated by bailouts. He is a human wrecking ball. I'd take Palin over Obama, though she's not my ideal candidate. Chris Christie is my top candidate right now.
It was anecdotal; I think Dick Morris said it. It wasn't that her + > - so much as he though her overall contribution to the McC campaign was net +.
How about hard evidence of any positive results under Obama? Job creation? Nope! Lower deficits? Nope! Lower debt? Nope! Lower Health Insurance premiums? Nope! A rising dollar? Nope!
The stock market has risen, but that doesn't look like it will last and it was coming off of major lows and inflated by bailouts. He is a human wrecking ball. I'd take Palin over Obama, though she's not my ideal candidate. Chris Christie is my top candidate right now.
I'd vote for Jindal. He is well spoken and has a pair of brass ones against Obama.
That's what people said against McCain too, yet when he actually had to go face to face with Obama in the debates, he got mutilated. That's a whole different game than just popping off at the mouth for the cameras.
Also if Jindal runs (I personally doubt he will) the smartest thing the Democrats could do is use his attacks on Obama against him considering that the pinnacle city of his state still needs rebuilding 5 or 7 years after Katrina. That's a major ***** in his armor.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
