Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Before I get to the main topic, has anyone else noticed how debate moderators in some of the big debates over the past month, have largely been blatantly and clearly biased? While most of us are aware of the large portion of the media/hollywood being liberal and doing everything they can to get aide liberals, for it to reach out into even debate moderators just furthers my disgust.
Here, Rubio, A LATINO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!! for those who arent aware, is questioned by a liberal, biased "debate moderator". The debate moderator asks him why he is anti-Latino........
In case you are a liberal or you missed the point, Rubio is a LATINO!!!!! Yet he is anti-Latino according to someone who is supposed to be a moderator?!?!?! Really? Why the moderator even asked the question the way he did is just idiotic. And take note, how Rubio responded with class.
My God, this media, the liberals, and those who are hispanic who are against someone if they happen to oppose ILLEGAL immigration, are just absolutely ignorant, full of it, and it would suit you better, us better, and the nation better if youd just pack your junk up and leave.
The only ones who continue to prove that they are bigots and racists are the liberal groups, the hispanics who harbor pro-ILLEGAL immigration, and those who will bash a person of color because they happen to be NON-liberal.
April 27 he had strong reservations about the Ariz law. Nine days later, he says he would have voted for it. What happened in between? TPer outrage and polls showing Fla voters for the law even though most Fla Latinos are against it. But hey, what do a few Latinos matter, compared to votes?
April 27 he had strong reservations about the Ariz law. Nine days later, he says he would have voted for it. What happened in between? TPer outrage and polls showing Fla voters for the law even though most Fla Latinos are against it. But hey, what do a few Latinos matter, compared to votes?
The bill in Arizona took federal immigration law and gave authorities in the state the right to enforce it because the government of Arizona felt that the feds were not doing their job. Perhaps you will understand how the majority of Americans feel about open borders when the election is over and many Liberal Democrats (that are more likely to support amnesty) are voted out of office. Rubio has the right to support immigration enforcement and I would vote for him if I lived in Florida. Only the race-baiting far left could come up with the idea that Rubio is a self-hating Latino because he supports enforcing the immigration law.
April 27 he had strong reservations about the Ariz law. Nine days later, he says he would have voted for it. What happened in between? TPer outrage and polls showing Fla voters for the law even though most Fla Latinos are against it. But hey, what do a few Latinos matter, compared to votes?
Your calling him anti-latino because he favors Arizona's anti illegal law? You don't even realize that by making this declaration, you are saying that all Latinos have to be pro illegal.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why the moderator even asked the question the way he did is just idiotic. And take note, how Rubio responded with class. 
