Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If he wore his sexuality on his sleeve and ran a campaign focused on gay issues, he probably wouldn't be elected. However, if he was like Buchanan and kept it in the bedroom, it could happen.
If Hillary Clinton would have won, we would have a lesbian President now.
Over-dramatic much? I wouldn't expect anything less........
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyGem
The real truth is that homosexuals are heterophobic.
Thanks for the good laugh. What an idiotic statement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyGem
I don't like to think of my President in terms of their sexuality.
Kinda like imagining your parents having sex.
Gives me the Heebie Jeebies.
It should honestly never cross anyone's mind.
Why are you constantly thinking and talking about gay sex? You constantly bring it up even when it's not appropriate to a conversation. You think about gay sex more than the common gay person.
From what I've seen very few of the presidents could throw a baseball (either on field, or in family gatherings). Clinton and GW have been the best in modern times (but then Bush was a partner in the Texas team). Both actually threw from the pitchers mound. Most of the others stood closer.
I've been told that Truman could throw with either hand with some degree of accuracy.
But, to stay on topic, throwing like a girl has little to do with someones sexuality.
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,544 posts, read 56,054,732 times
Reputation: 11862
I doubt Americans would accept a gay president. And I doubt either party would nominate an openly gay or lesbian (speculation aside) candidate to run for president. Even the most liberal democratic politicians have a keen political sense and will realise it's a lost cause among the many Catholics and Black voters, for starters.
If we do or have had a gay president, they will be closeted. We still haven't even had a female, Jewish, completely non-white or Atheist president.
I doubt Americans would accept a gay president. And I doubt either party would nominate an openly gay or lesbian (speculation aside) candidate to run for president. Even the most liberal democratic politicians have a keen political sense and will realise it's a lost cause among the many Catholics and Black voters, for starters.
If we do or have had a gay president, they will be closeted. We still haven't even had a female, Jewish, completely non-white or Atheist president.
muslim hate us allready. talk about trying to blow up the white house.we dont want to **** them off.our current president wants to be friends with them at any cost.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
