ever notice how people on this forum automatically get behind a candidate when the media starts talking about them? (Ron Paul, vote)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
first it was trump. media started talking about him and at one time he was in first place in a rasmussen poll.
then it was cain.media started talking about him and he was tied for first in iowa for a period of time.
then it was bachmann. media started talking about her and she has now catapulted to second in a rasumssen poll.
now its rick perry i hear, and what a coincidence, but now everybody is talking about him on this forum and hes polling high in iowa.
the media determines who is credible and who is not.
we the people then take there lead and support who they say to support, and stay away from the non credible candidate since the media says too.
ive seen many people on this forum follow this pattern, including myself.
i just have the balls to admit it. i jumped from cain to bachmann, and it coincided when the media began talking about her more and more.
rick perry this rick perry that is all because of the media. people like they normally do are just carrying the medias water.
And how many times I've been called tinfoiler, kook, and had black helicopters posted as replies to my posts for saying that? Glad to see you're beginning to see the light Even in 2008 I supported Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel over Obama. I only voted for Obama because by then those 2 had dropped out when the primary reached PA.
Last edited by theunbrainwashed; 07-04-2011 at 04:42 PM..
And how many times I've been called tinfoiler, kook, and had black helicopters posted as replies to my posts for saying that? Glad to see you're beginning to see the light
I don't know why you would "jump" on anyone. Sit back, watch the drama unfold, do more listening instead of cheerleading, and in the end you can cast a vote that probably won't matter anyway. LOL
The problem is people take politicians personally.
Yes, I'm guilty of that as well. But I make it clear that in terms of mainstream candidates only, I would vote for X or Y. But Ron Paul will have my vote if he sticks to the PA primary and I'll be supporting him throughout the primary. My first voting choice is going to be Ron Paul always, but I have my "backups" is what I'm saying
I don't know why you would "jump" on anyone. Sit back, watch the drama unfold, do more listening instead of cheerleading, and in the end you can cast a vote that probably won't matter anyway. LOL
The problem is people take politicians personally.
Unless we get up and read and monitor the roll call vote for every bill, unless we watch CSPAN around the clock, unless they've all written books and unless we've been subscribing to local newspapers in their home states, we have to rely on the media to tell us who is running, who is thinking about it and what they have to say on the issues.
Armed with that basic information, it's up to us to do the research to see if they've walked the walk not just talked the talk and make sure we get the rest of our info from the horse's mouth in the form of interviews, videos, debates.
When a new candidate enters the race think of it like a new girl coming into the corner bar. If you are a guy, you are excited and interested...after you see her for 6 months and get to know her better, ahhhh maybe not so much.
Unless we get up and read and monitor the roll call vote for every bill, unless we watch CSPAN around the clock, unless they've all written books and unless we've been subscribing to local newspapers in their home states, we have to rely on the media to tell us who is running, who is thinking about it and what they have to say on the issues.
Armed with that basic information, it's up to us to do the research to see if they've walked the walk not just talked the talk and make sure we get the rest of our info from the horse's mouth in the form of interviews, videos, debates.
When a new candidate enters the race think of it like a new girl coming into the corner bar. If you are a guy, you are excited and interested...after you see her for 6 months and get to know her better, ahhhh maybe not so much.
you are the same as well. you jumped to rick perry.
first it was trump. media started talking about him and at one time he was in first place in a rasmussen poll.
then it was cain.media started talking about him and he was tied for first in iowa for a period of time.
then it was bachmann. media started talking about her and she has now catapulted to second in a rasumssen poll.
now its rick perry i hear, and what a coincidence, but now everybody is talking about him on this forum and hes polling high in iowa.
the media determines who is credible and who is not.
we the people then take there lead and support who they say to support, and stay away from the non credible candidate since the media says too.
ive seen many people on this forum follow this pattern, including myself.
i just have the balls to admit it. i jumped from cain to bachmann, and it coincided when the media began talking about her more and more.
rick perry this rick perry that is all because of the media. people like they normally do are just carrying the medias water.
I just hope they never start talking about Obama, if its the case. we dont want anybody behind him. God help us all if Obama get another 4 years!!!!!!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.