Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They do not understand how posting U-Tube after U-Tube makes them look less intelligent not more. They also do not realize most posters do not bother watching them since U-Tube is not a valid source of information
I don't know how old you are but when I was in school we were taught that PRIMARY sources were the most valuable references you can use. When you can get Ron Paul on tape making an important point, that is a primary source!
Which is more credible: my telling you Ron Paul says something or you actually seeing it and hearing it with your own ears???? Hmm?
Sure I can write from here till kingdom come about my ideas -- but if I can provide primary sources to SUBSTANTIATE them, then they hold more water.
I don't know how old you are but when I was in school we were taught that PRIMARY sources were the most valuable references you can use. When you can get Ron Paul on tape making an important point, that is a primary source!
Which is more credible: my telling you Ron Paul says something or you actually seeing it and hearing it with your own ears???? Hmm?
Sure I can write from here till kingdom come about my ideas -- but if I can provide primary sources to SUBSTANTIATE them, then they hold more water.
Why, are you auditorily impaired or something? I think it's much better to see and hear video because then you're exposed to facial expressions, demeanor, etc. Like the video of Mitt stammering his answer about the NDAA, his whole persona screamed 'LIAR' the whole time he spoke.
All you have to do is do the research like we do slack. Often there are primary sources available. We aren't making it up. It isn't a figment of our imagination.
The problem is when people think that surfing the latest infowars videos or equates to research. I don't think you are making it up, I just think you are gullible and somewhat naive about what "research" consists of.
Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper
I don't know any other way to explain intentional ignorance. People will justify anything, if it comforts them, perhaps that is why you are so unable to discern fact from fiction.
Says the person who thinks there are agents planted in the forums to intimidate those enlightened few who recognize the evil government conspiracies.
Why, are you auditorily impaired or something? I think it's much better to see and hear video because then you're exposed to facial expressions, demeanor, etc. Like the video of Mitt stammering his answer about the NDAA, his whole persona screamed 'LIAR' the whole time he spoke.
I read faster than most people talk.
EDIT: Also, I like to listen to music and audio interferes with that.
Slack, video clips of news programs, interviews and speeches should have much more credibility than Alex Jones. Do you lump them all together just so you can falsely discredit them, or do you believe there's some big boogeyman behind the scenes distorting them? (Kinda like the 'agents provocateur' you mentioned)
EDIT: Also, I like to listen to music and audio interferes with that.
We should all read faster than people talk.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
